From: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chad Talbott <ctalbott@google.com>,
Divyesh Shah <dpshah@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6 v4] blkio-cgroup: Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:47:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D53982F.3030009@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D51ED26.8050809@cn.fujitsu.com>
Document for blkio.use_hierarchy interface
Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt b/Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt
index 4ed7b5c..24399f4 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroups/blkio-controller.txt
@@ -91,30 +91,62 @@ Throttling/Upper Limit policy
Hierarchical Cgroups
====================
-- Currently none of the IO control policy supports hierarhical groups. But
- cgroup interface does allow creation of hierarhical cgroups and internally
- IO policies treat them as flat hierarchy.
+- Cgroup interface allows creation of hierarchical cgroups. Currently,
+ internally IO policies are able to treat them as flat hierarchy or
+ hierarchical hierarchy. Both hierarchical bandwidth division and flat
+ bandwidth division are supported. "blkio.use_hierarchy" can be used to
+ switch between flat mode and hierarchical mode.
- So this patch will allow creation of cgroup hierarhcy but at the backend
- everything will be treated as flat. So if somebody created a hierarchy like
- as follows.
+ Note: Currently, "blkio.use_hierarchy" only effects proportional bandwidth
+ division. For Throttling logic, it still continues to treat everything as flat.
- root
- / \
- test1 test2
- |
- test3
+ Consider the following CGroup hierarchy:
- CFQ and throttling will practically treat all groups at same level.
+ Root
+ / | \
+ Grp1 Grp2 tsk1
+ / \
+ Grp3 tsk2
- pivot
- / | \ \
- root test1 test2 test3
+ If blkio.use_hierarchy is disabled in all CGroups, CFQ will practically treat all groups
+ at the same level.
- Down the line we can implement hierarchical accounting/control support
- and also introduce a new cgroup file "use_hierarchy" which will control
- whether cgroup hierarchy is viewed as flat or hierarchical by the policy..
- This is how memory controller also has implemented the things.
+ Pivot tree
+ / | | \
+ Root Grp1 Grp2 Grp3
+ / |
+ tsk1 tsk2
+
+ If blkio.use_hierarchy is enabled in Root group, then all children will inherit it, thus
+ all children group have use_hierarchy=1 set automatically and looks as follows.
+
+ Pivot tree
+ |
+ Root
+ / | \
+ Grp1 Grp2 tsk1
+ / \
+ Grp3 tsk2
+
+ If blkio.use_hierarchy is enabled in Grp1 and Grp3, CFQ will treat groups and tasks as the
+ same view in CGroup hierarchy, it looks as follows.
+
+
+ Pivot tree
+ / | \
+ Root Grp1 Grp2
+ / / \
+ tsk1 Grp3 tsk2
+
+ Root, Grp1 and Grp2 are treated at the same level under Pivot tree. tsk1 stays under Root.
+ Grp3 and tsk2 are treated at the same level under Grp1. Below is the mapping between
+ task io priority and io weight:
+
+ prio 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
+ weight 1000 868 740 612 484 356 228 100
+
+ Note: Regardless of the use_hierarchy setting in Root group, Root group is always put onto
+ Pivot tree.
Various user visible config options
===================================
@@ -169,6 +201,17 @@ Proportional weight policy files
dev weight
8:16 300
+- blkio.use_hierarchy
+ - Switch between hierarchical mode and flat mode as stated above.
+ blkio.use_hierarchy == 1 means hierarchical mode is enabled.
+ blkio.use_hierarchy == 0 means flat mode is enabled.
+ You can set this interface only if there isn't any child CGroup under
+ this CGroup. If one CGroup's blkio.use_hierarchy is set, the created
+ children will inherit it. it's not allowed to unset it in children.
+ The default mode in Root CGroup is flat.
+ blkio.use_hierarchy only works for proportional bandwidth division
+ as of today and doesn't have any effect on throttling logic.
+
- blkio.time
- disk time allocated to cgroup per device in milliseconds. First
two fields specify the major and minor number of the device and
--
1.7.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4D51ED26.8050809@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-02-10 7:46 ` [PATCH 1/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ queue Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 2/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Introduce cfq_entity for CFQ group Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 3/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Introduce vdisktime and io weight for CFQ queue Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 19:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-12 1:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 16:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-15 1:53 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-15 14:24 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-16 1:06 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 18:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-15 1:46 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-18 6:04 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-18 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-21 1:13 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-21 5:55 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-21 15:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-14 23:32 ` Justin TerAvest
2011-02-15 1:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-15 14:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 4/6 v4] cfq-iosched: Extract some common code of service tree handling for CFQ queue and CFQ group Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 7:47 ` [PATCH 5/6 v4] cfq-iosched: CFQ group hierarchical scheduling and use_hierarchy interface Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-10 20:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-12 2:21 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 18:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-15 2:38 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-15 14:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-16 1:44 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-16 14:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-17 1:22 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-16 17:22 ` Divyesh Shah
2011-02-16 17:28 ` Divyesh Shah
2011-02-16 18:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-14 3:20 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-14 18:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-02-17 0:31 ` Justin TerAvest
2011-02-17 1:21 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-17 17:36 ` Justin TerAvest
2011-02-18 1:14 ` Gui Jianfeng
2011-02-17 10:39 ` Alan Cox
2011-02-10 7:47 ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D53982F.3030009@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox