From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, numa: refactoring numa_register_memblks
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:58:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5C3A81.4070408@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5C3A0F.3080107@kernel.org>
Don't hide init_memory_mapping and setup_bootmem into that __register__ function
those are really work.
Also We don't need to scan two times for setup_node_bootmem() becase we
are using mapped memblock for node_data already.
let num_register_memblks only take care of register them into early_node_map[]
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_me
static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
{
- int i, j, nid;
+ int i;
/* Account for nodes with cpus and no memory */
node_possible_map = numa_nodes_parsed;
@@ -515,33 +515,34 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(
if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi))
return -EINVAL;
- init_memory_mapping_high();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void __init setup_numa_bootmem(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
+{
+ int i, nid;
/*
- * Finally register nodes. Do it twice in case setup_node_bootmem
- * missed one due to missing bootmem.
+ * Do not do that twice, not needed!
+ * We are using mapped memblock directly for node data
*/
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
- for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
- u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
- u64 end = 0;
-
- if (node_online(nid))
- continue;
+ for_each_node_mask(nid, node_possible_map) {
+ u64 start = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
+ u64 end = 0;
- for (j = 0; j < mi->nr_blks; j++) {
- if (nid != mi->blk[j].nid)
- continue;
- start = min(mi->blk[j].start, start);
- end = max(mi->blk[j].end, end);
- }
+ if (node_online(nid))
+ continue;
- if (start < end)
- setup_node_bootmem(nid, start, end);
+ for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+ if (nid != mi->blk[i].nid)
+ continue;
+ start = min(mi->blk[i].start, start);
+ end = max(mi->blk[i].end, end);
}
- }
- return 0;
+ if (start < end)
+ setup_node_bootmem(nid, start, end);
+ }
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
@@ -968,6 +969,10 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
if (numa_register_memblks(&numa_meminfo) < 0)
continue;
+ init_memory_mapping_high();
+
+ setup_numa_bootmem(&numa_meminfo);
+
for (j = 0; j < nr_cpu_ids; j++) {
int nid = early_cpu_to_node(j);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 20:56 [PATCH] x86, numa: exit early on numa_reset_distance() Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 20:57 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: seperate alloc_numa_distance from numa_reset_distance Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 21:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-16 22:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 22:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-02-16 22:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 20:58 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2011-02-16 22:43 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: refactoring numa_register_memblks Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 22:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 23:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 22:30 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: put dummy_numa_init in init section Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 22:44 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <20110217130526.GB27911@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <20110217132435.GV19830@htj.dyndns.org>
[not found] ` <20110217135628.GB7018@elte.hu>
[not found] ` <4D5D48DA.6020908@kernel.org>
[not found] ` <20110217161649.GD14168@elte.hu>
2011-02-24 7:21 ` [PATCH -v2] x86: Rename e820_table_* to pgt_buf_* Yinghai Lu
2011-02-24 13:59 ` [PATCH] " Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 22:31 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: cleanup x86_acpi_numa_init() Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 22:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 22:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 22:39 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: exit early on numa_reset_distance() Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 23:08 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-02-16 23:15 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5C3A81.4070408@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox