From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, <cypher.w@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IGMP and rwlock: Dead ocurred again on TILEPro
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:49:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5DA60A.8080201@tilera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110216.214625.189707123.davem@davemloft.net>
On 2/17/2011 12:46 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:42:37 +0800
>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:04:14PM +0800, Cypher Wu wrote:
>>>> Have you turned CONFIG_LOCKDEP on?
>>>>
>>>> I think Eric already converted that rwlock into RCU lock, thus
>>>> this problem should disappear. Could you try a new kernel?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>> I haven't turned CONFIG_LOCKDEP on for test since I didn't get too
>>> much information when we tried to figured out the former deadlock.
>>>
>>> IGMP used read_lock() instead of read_lock_bh() since usually
>>> read_lock() can be called recursively, and today I've read the
>>> implementation of MIPS, it's should also works fine in that situation.
>>> The implementation of TILEPro cause problem since after it use TNS set
>>> the lock-val to 1 and hold the original value and before it re-set
>>> lock-val a new value, it a race condition window.
>>>
>> I see no reason why you can't call read_lock_bh() recursively,
>> read_lock_bh() is roughly equalent to local_bh_disable() + read_lock(),
>> both can be recursive.
>>
>> But I may miss something here. :-/
> IGMP is doing this so that taking the read lock does not stop packet
> processing.
>
> TILEPro's rwlock implementation is simply buggy and needs to be fixed.
Cypher, thanks for tracking this down with a good bug report.
The fix is to disable interrupts for the arch_read_lock family of methods.
In my fix I'm using the "hard" disable that locks out NMIs as well, so that
in the event the NMI handler needs to share an rwlock with regular code it
would be possible (plus, it's more efficient). I believe it's not
necessary to worry about similar protection for the arch_write_lock
methods, since they aren't guaranteed to be re-entrant anyway (you'd have
to use write_lock_irqsave or equivalent).
I'll send the patch to LKML after letting it bake internally for a little
while.
Thanks again!
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-17 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-17 3:39 Fwd: IGMP and rwlock: Dead ocurred again on TILEPro Cypher Wu
2011-02-17 4:49 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-17 5:04 ` Cypher Wu
2011-02-17 5:42 ` Américo Wang
2011-02-17 5:46 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 6:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-17 22:49 ` Chris Metcalf [this message]
2011-02-17 22:53 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 23:04 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-02-17 23:11 ` David Miller
2011-02-17 23:18 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-02-18 3:16 ` Cypher Wu
2011-02-18 3:19 ` Cypher Wu
2011-02-18 7:08 ` Cypher Wu
2011-02-18 21:51 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-02-19 4:07 ` Cypher Wu
2011-02-20 13:33 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-03-01 18:30 ` [PATCH] arch/tile: fix deadlock bugs in rwlock implementation Chris Metcalf
2011-02-17 6:42 ` Fwd: IGMP and rwlock: Dead ocurred again on TILEPro Cypher Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D5DA60A.8080201@tilera.com \
--to=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=cypher.w@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).