From: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
stable@kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
preining@logic.at
Subject: Re: 2.6.37.1 s2disk regression (TPM)
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:30:41 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D628521.8000205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201102201248.10779.rjw@sisk.pl>
On 02/20/2011 08:48 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, February 20, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> No, and the author and maintainer have not been responding. If that contiunes,I'll simply ask Linus to revert it.
Sorry, but you sent the email this Friday, I didn't catch it in time and I wasn't working during the weekend.
> BTW, the first hunk from that commit in drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c seems to be
> completely broken:
>
> @@ -577,9 +577,11 @@ duration:
> if (rc)
> return;
>
> - if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code)
> - != 3 * sizeof(u32))
> + if (be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.return_code) != 0 ||
> + be32_to_cpu(tpm_cmd.header.out.length)
> + != sizeof(tpm_cmd.header.out) + sizeof(u32) + 3 * sizeof(u32))
> return;
> +
> duration_cap =&tpm_cmd.params.getcap_out.cap.duration;
> chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
> usecs_to_jiffies(be32_to_cpu(duration_cap->tpm_short));
>
> Namely, either the old code always returned as a result of the conditional
> being removed, or the new code will always return as a result of
> the (... != 0) check. I wonder if there's supposed to be (... == 0) instead?
The previous code was checking the wrong field of the TPM returned buffer, probably
due an old commit that incorporated the tpm_cmd strucuture, it should check if the return code
is != 0, which if true, means that the command didn't succeed. The output length check should be
just a sanity check, so indeed the logical operator should be&& instead. Although it should also be
fixed, I don't think this is the cause, since in case the timeout retrieval from the TPM fail,
the device driver falls back to default values, which has been working before this commit.
> [And why not to simply use 4*sizeof(u32) FWIW?]
I can't see why, I'll update it.
The failure for this specific board then sounds to be due the TPM returning inconsistent timeout values.
Norbert, can 'cat /sys/devices/pnp0/00\:0*/timeouts' and send the output?
Rajiv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-21 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-20 10:13 2.6.37.1 s2disk regression (TPM) Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 10:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:46 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-20 10:57 ` [REVERT request stable-2.6.36/37] " Jiri Slaby
2011-02-20 16:50 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2011-02-20 11:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-21 15:30 ` Rajiv Andrade [this message]
2011-02-21 16:34 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-21 17:12 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 20:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 21:29 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-21 21:44 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 22:07 ` Rajiv Andrade
2011-02-21 22:10 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-21 22:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-22 0:42 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-22 8:41 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 11:57 ` Stefan Berger
2011-02-22 17:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 5:39 ` Norbert Preining
2011-02-22 8:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2011-02-22 9:13 ` Norbert Preining
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D628521.8000205@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=debora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=preining@logic.at \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox