public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 15:09:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D67AA06.5090200@cs.helsinki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D3D15AF.30508@zytor.com>

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:13:41AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> We could do cmpxchg with a structure... the problem with a lon int
>>> type is that Cristoph ran into bugs with __int128 on 64 bits.

On 01/21/2011 09:19 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> But, IIRC, the problem with int128 was with passing it as parameter
>> and return value. We don't have to do that. We'll be just using it
>> as a data storage / container type. Or even that is broken?

On 1/24/11 8:01 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Well, part of the point was to pass in registers.
>
> No idea on the data storage type.

Ping? The current situation is that we're unable to merge a perfectly 
good SLUB performance optimization because we can't seem to agree on the 
this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() API.

			Pekka

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-25 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-06 20:45 [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 0/4] this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 1/4] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg_double Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 21:08   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-06 21:43     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 22:05   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-07 15:15     ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-07 18:04       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-07 18:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-08 17:24           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-09  8:33             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-21  7:31             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-01-21  9:26               ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 15:31                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 15:48                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 16:30                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 16:34                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 16:54                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:07                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:50                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:06                           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:37                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:08                       ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-21 17:13                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 17:19                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-24  6:01                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-02-25 13:09                               ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2011-02-25 13:19                                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 16:26                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 16:37                                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-25 16:43                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-02-25 16:38                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-25 16:45                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:24                           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 17:42                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 17:50                               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:10                                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-21 18:42                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 18:31                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-21 18:46                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-01-21 19:32                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-01-23 18:00                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 2/4] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg_double() support Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 3/4] slub: Get rid of slab_free_hook_irq() Christoph Lameter
2011-01-06 20:45 ` [cpuops cmpxchg double V2 4/4] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D67AA06.5090200@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox