From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757311Ab1CBSMj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:12:39 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:51679 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757192Ab1CBSMi (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 13:12:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4D6E8874.6070000@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:12:04 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Tejun Heo , Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Reverting NUMA-affine page table allocation References: <20110226143730.GA26864@htj.dyndns.org> <20110302161900.GP3319@htj.dyndns.org> <20110302170702.GS3319@htj.dyndns.org> <20110302180827.GA13693@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20110302180827.GA13693@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/02/2011 10:08 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> To me, it seems complicated for not good enough reasons. I'll defer >> the decision to x86 maintainers. Ingo, hpa, Thomas, what do you guys >> think? > > Would be nice to see an actual patch that does the revert. > I also would like to point out that we are at -rc7. The time to test new things is quickly running out, so a more conservative option for this upcoming merge window is starting to look good. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.