public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@genband.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Albert Cahalan <acahalan@gmail.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	johnwheffner@gmail.com, linville@tuxdriver.com,
	jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: txqueuelen has wrong units; should be time
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 14:25:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6EA7C0.1020702@genband.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1103020358010.7942@uplift.swm.pp.se>

On 03/01/2011 09:10 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> For the case when we're ourselves originating the traffic (for instance to 
> a wifi card with varying speed and jitter due to retransmits on the wifi 
> layer), I think it's taking the too easy way out to use the same 
> mechanisms (dropping packets or marking ECN for our own originated packets 
> seems really weird), here we should be able to pushback information to the 
> applications somehow and do prioritization between flows since we're 
> sitting on all information ourselves including the application.

Doesn't the socket tx buffer give all the app pushback necessary?
(Assuming it's set to a sane value.)

We should certainly do prioritization between flows.  Perhaps if no
other information is available the scheduler priority could be used?

Chris

-- 
Chris Friesen
Software Developer
GENBAND
chris.friesen@genband.com
www.genband.com

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-27  5:44 txqueuelen has wrong units; should be time Albert Cahalan
2011-02-27  7:02 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-02-27  7:54   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-27  8:27     ` Albert Cahalan
2011-02-27 10:55       ` Jussi Kivilinna
2011-02-27 20:07         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-27 21:32           ` Jussi Kivilinna
2011-02-28 11:43           ` Jussi Kivilinna
2011-02-28 13:10             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 18:31               ` Jussi Kivilinna
2011-02-28 16:11           ` John W. Linville
2011-02-28 16:48             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 16:55               ` John W. Linville
2011-02-28 17:18                 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-28 21:45                 ` John Heffner
2011-03-01  4:11                   ` Albert Cahalan
2011-03-01  4:18                     ` David Miller
2011-03-01  6:54                       ` Albert Cahalan
2011-03-01  7:25                         ` David Miller
2011-03-01  7:26                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 19:37                           ` Albert Cahalan
2011-03-01 20:14                             ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01 20:16                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-02  3:10                           ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-03-02 20:25                             ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2011-03-01  5:01                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-03-01  5:36                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-02-27 23:33         ` Albert Cahalan
2011-02-28 11:23           ` Jussi Kivilinna
2011-02-28 15:38           ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-02-28 16:37             ` Albert Cahalan
2011-02-28 17:45               ` John W. Linville
2011-02-28 17:20             ` Bill Sommerfeld
2011-02-28 21:51               ` John Heffner
2011-03-01  0:46                 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-03-02  6:25                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-02  6:41                     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-03-02  7:07                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-03-02 16:41                         ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2011-03-02 16:50                           ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D6EA7C0.1020702@genband.com \
    --to=chris.friesen@genband.com \
    --cc=acahalan@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=johnwheffner@gmail.com \
    --cc=jussi.kivilinna@mbnet.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swmike@swm.pp.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox