[PATCH 1/2] x86, numa, emu: move size calculation into if block

[PATCH 1/2] x86, numa, emu: move size calculation into if block

[Yinghai Lu]

don't need to assign them that early.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c        |   11 +++++------
 arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -390,13 +390,12 @@ static void __init numa_nodemask_from_me
  */
 void __init numa_reset_distance(void)
 {
-	size_t size = numa_distance_cnt * numa_distance_cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
-
 	/* numa_distance could be 1LU marking allocation failure, test cnt */
-	if (numa_distance_cnt)
-		memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(numa_distance),
-					__pa(numa_distance) + size);
-	numa_distance_cnt = 0;
+	if (numa_distance_cnt) {
+		size_t size = numa_distance_cnt * numa_distance_cnt * sizeof(numa_distance[0]);
+		memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(numa_distance), __pa(numa_distance) + size);
+		numa_distance_cnt = 0;
+	}
 	numa_distance = NULL;	/* enable table creation */
 }
 
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_m
 	static struct numa_meminfo pi __initdata;
 	const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	u8 *phys_dist = NULL;
-	size_t phys_size = numa_dist_cnt * numa_dist_cnt * sizeof(phys_dist[0]);
+	size_t phys_size = 0;
 	int i, j, ret;
 
 	if (!emu_cmdline)
@@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_m
 	if (numa_dist_cnt) {
 		u64 phys;
 
+		phys_size = numa_dist_cnt * numa_dist_cnt * sizeof(phys_dist[0]);
 		phys = memblock_find_in_range(0,
 					      (u64)max_pfn_mapped << PAGE_SHIFT,
 					      phys_size, PAGE_SIZE);

[PATCH 2/2] x86, numa, emu: only transform numa_distance if SLIT is there

[Yinghai Lu]

during copying should only copy with NEW numa_dist_cnt size.
need to call numa_alloc_dist() at first,  and it will set default values.

So we will not need to go over the big matrix without meaning.

Need to make numa_alloc_distance to return new numa_dist_cnt

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c        |    4 +--
 arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h  |    1 
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ void __init numa_reset_distance(void)
 	numa_distance = NULL;	/* enable table creation */
 }
 
-static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
+int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
 {
 	nodemask_t nodes_parsed;
 	size_t size;
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(vo
 				LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=%d\n", cnt);
 
-	return 0;
+	return cnt;
 }
 
 /**
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_emulation.c
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_m
 	const u64 max_addr = max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
 	u8 *phys_dist = NULL;
 	size_t phys_size = 0;
-	int i, j, ret;
+	int i, j, ret, new_nr;
 
 	if (!emu_cmdline)
 		goto no_emu;
@@ -380,28 +380,39 @@ void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_m
 		if (emu_nid_to_phys[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
 			emu_nid_to_phys[i] = 0;
 
+	/* Transform distance table */
+	numa_reset_distance();
 	/*
-	 * Transform distance table.  numa_set_distance() ignores all
-	 * out-of-bound distances.  Just call it for every possible node
-	 * combination.
+	 * allocate numa_distance at first,
+	 *  it will set new numa_dist_cnt and default values
 	 */
-	numa_reset_distance();
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_NUMNODES; i++) {
-		for (j = 0; j < MAX_NUMNODES; j++) {
-			int physi = emu_nid_to_phys[i];
-			int physj = emu_nid_to_phys[j];
-			int dist;
-
-			if (physi >= numa_dist_cnt || physj >= numa_dist_cnt)
-				dist = physi == physj ?
-					LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE;
-			else
+	new_nr = numa_alloc_distance();
+	if (new_nr < 0)
+		goto free_temp_phys;
+
+	/*
+	 * only set it when we have old phys_dist,
+	 * numa_alloc_distance() already set default values
+	 */
+	if (phys_dist)
+		for (i = 0; i < new_nr; i++) {
+			for (j = 0; j < new_nr; j++) {
+				int physi = emu_nid_to_phys[i];
+				int physj = emu_nid_to_phys[j];
+				int dist;
+
+				/* really need this check ? */
+				if (physi >= numa_dist_cnt ||
+				    physj >= numa_dist_cnt)
+					continue;
+
 				dist = phys_dist[physi * numa_dist_cnt + physj];
 
-			numa_set_distance(i, j, dist);
+				numa_set_distance(i, j, dist);
+			}
 		}
-	}
 
+free_temp_phys:
 	/* free the copied physical distance table */
 	if (phys_dist)
 		memblock_x86_free_range(__pa(phys_dist), __pa(phys_dist) + phys_size);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct numa_meminfo {
 void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi);
 int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi);
 void __init numa_reset_distance(void);
+int numa_alloc_distance(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_EMU
 void __init numa_emulation(struct numa_meminfo *numa_meminfo,

Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, numa, emu: move size calculation into if block

[Tejun Heo]

Hey, Yinghai.

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:25:06PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> don't need to assign them that early.

You know I'm not gonna take this, right?  Don't make it uglier.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, numa, emu: only transform numa_distance if SLIT is there

[Tejun Heo]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:28:32PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> during copying should only copy with NEW numa_dist_cnt size.
> need to call numa_alloc_dist() at first,  and it will set default values.
> 
> So we will not need to go over the big matrix without meaning.
> 
> Need to make numa_alloc_distance to return new numa_dist_cnt
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>

I'm not taking this.  You can't send the same change twice and expect
different result.

-- 
tejun

Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, numa, emu: only transform numa_distance if SLIT is there

[Ingo Molnar]

* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:28:32PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > 
> > during copying should only copy with NEW numa_dist_cnt size.
> > need to call numa_alloc_dist() at first,  and it will set default values.
> > 
> > So we will not need to go over the big matrix without meaning.
> > 
> > Need to make numa_alloc_distance to return new numa_dist_cnt
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> 
> I'm not taking this.  You can't send the same change twice and expect
> different result.

Ping: what's the status of this - Yinghai, are you working on an improved version of 
these (and related) patches, as per the review suggestions from Tejun - or are you 
dropping them?

Thanks,

	Ingo