From: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Cc: Nikola Ciprich <extmaillist@linuxbox.cz>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz>,
KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: regression - 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 - kvm - 32bit SMP guests don't boot
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:57:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D716E43.4080909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299265762.11618.140.camel@mothafucka.localdomain>
On 03/04/2011 02:09 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 19:27 +0100, Nikola Ciprich wrote:
>
>> Hello Zachary,
>>
>>
>>> You don't see any messages about TSC being unstable or switching
>>> clocksource after loading the KVM module? And you are not suspending
>>> the host or anything?
>>>
>> no messages, no suspending, nothing.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Can you try using "processor.max_cstate=1" on the host as a kernel
>>> parameter and see if it makes a difference?
>>>
>> I tried it, no change..
>> n.
>>
> Zach,
>
> I don't understand 100 % the logic behind all your tsc changes.
> But kvm-clock-wise, most of the problems we had in the past were related
> to the difference in resolution between the tsc and the host clocksource
> (hpet, acpi_pm, etc), which in his case, it is a non-issue.
>
> It does seem to me like some compensation logic kicked in, dismantling
> an otherwise good tsc. He does have nonstop_tsc, which means it can't
> get any better.
>
> One thing I noticed when reading the culprit patch in bisect, is that in
> vcpu_load(), there were previously a call to
>
> kvm_request_guest_time_update(vcpu)
>
> that was removed without a counterpart addition. Any idea about why it
> was done?
>
That's probably the source of the bug... I've been looking for that
exact line, though, and I can't find it missing.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 23:42 regression - 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 - kvm - 32bit SMP guests don't boot Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-24 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 10:48 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-24 10:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 11:27 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-24 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 12:41 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-24 12:51 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 12:57 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-25 10:48 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-25 14:45 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-27 17:20 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-28 13:51 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-28 14:32 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-28 15:17 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-28 15:28 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-28 15:56 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-28 17:13 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-02-28 17:15 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-03 1:56 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-03 7:06 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-03 20:47 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-03 21:06 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-03 21:58 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-03 22:01 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-04 15:13 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-04 18:27 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-04 19:09 ` Glauber Costa
2011-03-04 20:55 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-04 21:41 ` Glauber Costa
2011-03-04 22:36 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-04 22:59 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-05 1:17 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-05 7:21 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-06 14:53 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-03-06 16:03 ` Nikola Ciprich
2011-03-04 22:57 ` Zachary Amsden [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D716E43.4080909@redhat.com \
--to=zamsden@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=extmaillist@linuxbox.cz \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).