From: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
bp@amd64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:17:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D78971C.6090107@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110310090444.GA25522@elte.hu>
On 10.3.2011 10:04, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
>>> Another, related, very nice kbuild feature would be to allow for arch maintainers to
>>> mark certain files as "should only build fine without warnings" - i.e. -Werror
>>> should be the default. There would be a Kconfig feature to opt out of this,
>>> CONFIG_CC_IGNORE_WARNINGS=y or so. This would allow for people to still build the
>>> kernel with old (or buggy) versions of GCC.
>>
>> To add -Werror for all files conditionally you can do:
>>
>> ccflags-$(CONFIG_WERROR) += -Werror
>>
>> For individual files we can then drop -Werror like this:
>>
>> CFLAGS_REMOVE_foobar.o := -Werror
>>
>> So it should be doable with the existing infrastructure.
>
> Stupid question: is there an existing kbuild rule that i could use to enable -Werror
> for a single .o file, such as kernel/sched.o - without affecting other files in
> kernel/ that i do not maintain?
CFLAGS_sched.o := -Werror
> Also, adding 3 lines per object file is pretty ugly - would it be possible to create
> a nicer, compact, single-line way to someone condense a CONFIG_ERROR opt-out
> mechanism, the -Werror default and the single-object-file into a single rule?
>
> Something like:
>
> obj-werror-y += sched.o
>
> Although i'm not sure if it is wise to mix build details into the object build tree
> hierarchy like that ...
One way without extending the current rules could be:
ifdef CONFIG_CC_WERROR
Werror := -Werror
endif
CFLAGS_sched.o := $(Werror)
CFLAGS_another.o := $(Werror)
What do you think?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 8:35 [PATCH -v5] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks Borislav Petkov
2011-03-09 14:45 ` Michal Marek
2011-03-09 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-09 17:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-03-10 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-10 9:17 ` Michal Marek [this message]
2011-03-10 10:25 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-03-10 9:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-10 11:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D78971C.6090107@suse.cz \
--to=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox