From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757398Ab1CNWNe (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:13:34 -0400 Received: from sabe.cs.wisc.edu ([128.105.6.20]:58921 "EHLO sabe.cs.wisc.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753536Ab1CNWNd (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4D7E930A.1010503@cs.wisc.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:13:30 -0500 From: Mike Christie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Fedora/3.0.10-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" CC: Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , James Bottomley , Hannes Reinecke , FUJITA Tomonori , Boaz Harrosh , Stephen Rothwell , Douglas Gilbert , Open iSCSI Subject: Re: [RFC-v2 01/12] iscsi: Resolve iscsi_proto.h naming conflicts with drivers/target/iscsi References: <1300103829-10337-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <1300103829-10337-2-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org> <20110314145930.GB28480@lst.de> <1300138856.28255.133.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> In-Reply-To: <1300138856.28255.133.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/14/2011 04:40 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 15:59 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:56:58AM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >>> From: Nicholas Bellinger >>> >>> This patch renames the following iscsi_proto.h structures to avoid >>> namespace issues with drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_core.h: >>> >>> *) struct iscsi_cmd -> struct iscsi_scsi_cmd >> >> This name is not overly descriptive. Using _req/_rsp uniformly would make a >> lot more sense. >> > > Mmmm, fair point here.. I don't have a strong preference so I will > defer to Mike and Hannes on this (open-iscsi CC'ed). Guys is this OK > with you..? > Ok with me.