From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753465Ab1CQKIX (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:08:23 -0400 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:55921 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751689Ab1CQKIV (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 06:08:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4D81DD93.6080909@fusionio.com> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 11:08:19 +0100 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin TerAvest CC: Vivek Goyal , "ctalbott@google.com" , "mrubin@google.com" , "jmoyer@redhat.com" , "guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Don't update group weights when on service tree. References: <1297458543-14779-1-git-send-email-teravest@google.com> <20110214165050.GD13097@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2011-03-16 21:28, Justin TerAvest wrote: > Jens, > > Could you please take a look and apply if this looks good to you? It looks fine, however it doesn't apply to for-2.6.39/core: patching file block/cfq-iosched.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 178 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 855 (offset -10 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 896 (offset -10 lines). Hunk #4 succeeded at 920 (offset -10 lines). Hunk #5 succeeded at 974 (offset -4 lines). Hunk #6 succeeded at 1009 (offset -3 lines). Hunk #7 FAILED at 1223. Hunk #8 FAILED at 1233. Hunk #9 succeeded at 1284 (offset -29 lines). Hunk #10 succeeded at 1397 with fuzz 1 (offset -27 lines). 2 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file block/cfq-iosched.c.rej Can you send me an updated variant, and I'll get it applied. -- Jens Axboe