public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] WARN_ON_SMP(): Allow use in if statements on UP
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:46:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D827326.1040208@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110317192208.444147791@goodmis.org>



On 03/17/2011 12:21 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt<srostedt@redhat.com>
>
> Both WARN_ON() and WARN_ON_SMP() should be able to be used in
> an if statement.
>
> 	if (WARN_ON_SMP(foo)) { ... }
>
> Because WARN_ON_SMP() is defined as a do { } while (0) on UP,
> it can not be used this way.
>
> Convert it to the same form that WARN_ON() is, even when
> CONFIG_SMP is off.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt<rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>   include/asm-generic/bug.h |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>   1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bug.h b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> index c2c9ba0..ac2f48a 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/bug.h
> @@ -165,10 +165,36 @@ extern void warn_slowpath_null(const char *file, const int line);
>   #define WARN_ON_RATELIMIT(condition, state)			\
>   		WARN_ON((condition)&&  __ratelimit(state))
>
> +/*
> + * WARN_ON_SMP() is for cases that the warning is either
> + * meaningless for !SMP or may even cause failures.
> + * This is usually used for cases that we have
> + * WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&lock)) checks, as spin_is_locked()
> + * returns 0 for uniprocessor settings.
> + * It can be also be used with values that are only defined

Typo: can be also be

--
Darren

> + * on SMP:
> + *
> + * struct foo {
> + *  [...]
> + * #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + *	int bar;
> + * #endif
> + * };
> + *
> + * void func(struct foo *zoot)
> + * {
> + *	WARN_ON_SMP(!zoot->bar);
> + *
> + * For CONFIG_SMP, WARN_ON_SMP() should act the same as WARN_ON(),
> + * and should be a nop and return false for uniprocessor.
> + *
> + * if (WARN_ON_SMP(x)) returns true only when CONFIG_SMP is set
> + * and x is true.
> + */
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>   # define WARN_ON_SMP(x)			WARN_ON(x)
>   #else
> -# define WARN_ON_SMP(x)			do { } while (0)
> +# define WARN_ON_SMP(x)			({0;})
>   #endif
>
>   #endif
> -- 1.7.2.3

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-17 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-17 19:21 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] futex: Fix WARN_ON triggering on UP Steven Rostedt
2011-03-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] WARN_ON_SMP(): Allow use in if statements " Steven Rostedt
2011-03-17 20:46   ` Darren Hart [this message]
2011-03-25  9:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-25 10:48   ` [tip:core/urgent] WARN_ON_SMP(): Allow use in if() " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 16:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-25 18:16       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 18:19         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 19:31           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-03-25 19:36             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 19:40             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 19:47               ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-03-25 19:53                 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-25 19:56                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] futex: Fix WARN_ON() test for UP Steven Rostedt
2011-03-17 20:00   ` Darren Hart
2011-03-25  9:35   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-25 10:49   ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-03-17 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] futex: Fix WARN_ON triggering on UP Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D827326.1040208@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox