From: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Naga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, rjw@sisk.pl, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2]: PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM under POWERSAVE mode
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:29:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D82EDAC.8070307@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110318041801.2349.33357.sendpatchset@nchumbalkar.americas.hpqcorp.net>
(2011/03/18 13:21), Naga Chumbalkar wrote:
> v2 -> v1:
> . Kept the logic in pci_raw_set_power_state
> . Changed the ASPM enabling logic
> . Modified the text that describes the problem
>
> v1 : http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=130013164703283&w=2
>
> The assumption made in commit 41cd766b065970ff6f6c89dd1cf55fa706c84a3d
> (PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance to veto it) that
> pci_enable_device() will result in re-configuring ASPM when aspm_policy is
> POWERSAVE is no longer valid. This is due to commit
> 97c145f7c87453cec90e91238fba5fe2c1561b32 (PCI: read current power state
> at enable time) which resets dev->current_state to D0. This makes the
> equality check (below) become true, so pcie_aspm_pm_state_change() never
> gets called.
> ./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_raw_set_pci_power_state()
> 546 /* Check if we're already there */
> 547 if (dev->current_state == state)
> 548 return 0;
>
> So OSPM doesnn't configure the PCIe links for ASPM.
>
> The patch below does the following:
> At the end of each Root Bridge scan make a call to configure ASPM when the
> ASPM policy is set to "powersave" mode. Note that if a previous pass had
> completed the configuration for all devices under that Bridge then the
> configuration will not take place again because pcie_config_aspm_link()
> checks to see if the link is already in the requested state.
> We won't reconfigure ASPM when _OSC control is not granted.
Which _OSC controls do we need for configuring ASPM?
Regards,
Kenji Kaneshige
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-18 4:21 [RFC][PATCH v2]: PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM under POWERSAVE mode Naga Chumbalkar
2011-03-18 5:29 ` Kenji Kaneshige [this message]
2011-03-18 14:52 ` Chumbalkar, Nagananda
2011-03-22 2:16 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2011-03-18 17:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D82EDAC.8070307@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox