From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: IIO comments
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:51:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D839B84.1040201@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103181757.58218.arnd@arndb.de>
On 03/18/11 16:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 18 March 2011, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> I guess if it's always in${i}-in${i+1}, it's still not too hard.
>> I think they have been so far, but doubt this is universal.
>> How about having a diff type and just having a pair of indices in the
>> channel structure? Actually may need a third for x^2+y^2+z^2 devices.
>> (iirc there are parts that do x^2+y^2 despite also having a z channel)
>> ...
>
> If two identifiers are common, that would probably be fine.
>
> If you have a x^2+y^2+z^2 device, it might be easier to call that
> a different type with a fixed name, as long as there is a small
> number of combinations.
True. A balance to be struck there as and when they occur.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-15 21:15 IIO comments Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 11:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 13:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 14:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 15:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2011-03-16 15:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 15:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 13:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 16:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 17:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 18:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 12:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 16:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 16:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 16:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-18 16:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-18 17:51 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2011-03-17 13:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 14:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 15:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-17 16:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 16:47 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-17 17:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-03-16 16:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-03-16 18:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D839B84.1040201@cam.ac.uk \
--to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=guenter.roeck@ericsson.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox