From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] Improve fallback LPJ calculation
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:40:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D83DF5B.1000006@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299768487-13200-1-git-send-email-ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com>
On 03/10/2011 06:48 AM, Phil Carmody wrote:
> Apologies for picking on you, Andrew, and sending this out of the blue,
> but I didn't have much luck with my previous attempt, and I quite like
> this patchset, so thought it was worth trying again.
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/9/28/121)
>
> The guts of this patchset are in patch 2/4. The motivation for that patch
> is that currently our OMAP calibrates itself using the trial-and-error
> binary chop fallback that some other architectures no longer need to
> perform. This is a lengthy process, taking 0.2s in an environment where
> boot time is of great interest.
>
>
[snip]
> 1/4 is simply cosmetic to prepare for 2/4.
> 4/4 is simply to assist testing and not intended for integration.
>
I tried this patch set out on an MSM7630.
Before:
Calibrating delay loop... 681.57 BogoMIPS (lpj=3407872)
After:
Calibrating delay loop... 680.75 BogoMIPS (lpj=3403776)
But the really good news is calibration time dropped from ~247ms to
~56ms. Sadly we won't be able to benefit from this should my udelay
patches make it into ARM because we would be using
calibrate_delay_direct() instead (at least on machines who choose to).
Can we somehow reapply the logic behind this to
calibrate_delay_direct()? That would be even better, but this is
definitely a boot time improvement.
Or maybe we could just replace calibrate_delay_direct() with this
fallback calculation? If __delay() is a thin wrapper around
read_current_timer() it should work just as well (plus patch 3 makes it
handle SMIs). I'll try that out.
You can add a
Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
to the first 3 patches.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-18 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-10 14:48 [PATCHv3 0/4] Improve fallback LPJ calculation Phil Carmody
2011-03-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] calibrate: extract fall-back calculation into own helper Phil Carmody
2011-03-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] calibrate: home in on correct lpj value more quickly Phil Carmody
2011-03-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] calibrate: retry with wider bounds when converge seems to fail Phil Carmody
2011-03-10 14:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] DO NOT INTEGRATE: test-only timing Phil Carmody
2011-03-11 23:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] calibrate: retry with wider bounds when converge seems to fail Andrew Morton
2011-03-12 2:10 ` Phil Carmody
2011-03-11 23:26 ` [PATCHv3 0/4] Improve fallback LPJ calculation Andrew Morton
2011-03-18 22:40 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-03-22 9:41 ` Phil Carmody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D83DF5B.1000006@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox