From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of a counter before test
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:46:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8B7570.40101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110324163332.GA2414@elte.hu>
On 03/24/2011 07:33 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/24/2011 11:48 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don, I've added yours SOB, ok? (The patch is attached to avoid
>>>> space/tabs problem
>>>> due to web-mail client)
>>>
>>> The patch lacks a proper description about the motivation and effects of the
>>> patch.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>
>> Ingo, does this one looks better?
>>
>> ---
>> From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of MSR register to catch unflagged overflows
>>
>> The read of a proper MSR register was missed so instead of a counter the
>> configration register is tested (it has ARCH_P4_UNFLAGGED_BIT always cleared)
>> and unflagged overflows never have been catched. Fix it by reading a proper
>> MSR register.
>
> So what effect does this have on the regular perf user? Please try to describe
> the real-life effect of the bug/problem fixed here.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
Unflagged overflows never have been catched due to missed read of a register which
is to signalize about it, and as result unknown nmi may happen leading to
"Dazen and confused" message. That is what supposed to be in changelog?
--
Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-24 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 8:29 [PATCH -tip] perf, x86: P4 PMU - Add missing read of a counter before test Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 8:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 9:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 15:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 16:46 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2011-03-24 16:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 16:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 17:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 18:22 ` Don Zickus
2011-03-24 18:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-03-24 20:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-24 12:28 ` Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D8B7570.40101@gmail.com \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox