public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Burt Triplett <burt@pbjtriplett.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BITS handling of CPU microcode updates
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:05:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8C3ED1.5000704@pbjtriplett.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ipv8kx8y.fsf@firstfloor.org>

On 3/24/2011 2:46 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh<hmh@hmh.eng.br>  writes:
>>
>> Very well, I will send patches to fix that behaviour, as well as some
>> other stuff I noticed that was not updated to match the recommended
>> actions documented by the SDM and some Intel application notes.
>
> I don't think you can easily -- there's no kernel interface
> to distingush the "explicit user action" case from automatic loading.

Correct, but the microcode module can still implement the "automatic 
loading" case, as Henrique's patch does.

> I suppose all the test labs have learned by now how to disable
> automatic updates ...

The microcode driver's current unsigned revision checking happens to 
treat negative revisions as large positive revisions, so it happened to 
work OK in the test lab environments, though not by design. :)

- Burt Triplett

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-25  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-24  5:36 [announce] Intel BIOS Implementation Test Suite (BITS) Burt Triplett
2011-03-12  2:30 ` BITS handling of CPU microcode updates Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-03-21 23:44   ` Burt Triplett
2011-03-24  0:14     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-03-24 20:53       ` Burt Triplett
2011-03-25  0:57         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-03-24 21:46       ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-25  7:05         ` Burt Triplett [this message]
2011-03-25  2:09       ` x86/microcode: intel: correctly handle negative revisions Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-03-25  7:14         ` Burt Triplett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D8C3ED1.5000704@pbjtriplett.org \
    --to=burt@pbjtriplett.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox