Re: [PATCH]arch:x86:kvm:i8254.h Fix typo in kvm_pit

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>]

On 03/30/2011 10:17 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 06:30 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 03/30/2011 09:26 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 03/30/2011 06:19 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>>> The below patch changes base_addresss to base_address.
>>>> Note: I have grepped for base_addresss and nothing shows up,
>>>> grepping for base_address gets me lots of output, telling me that
>>>> this is a typo, but could be wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h | 2 +-
>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h
>>>> index 46d08ca..c2fa48b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/i8254.h
>>>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct kvm_kpit_state {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> struct kvm_pit {
>>>> - unsigned long base_addresss;
>>>> + unsigned long base_address;
>>>> struct kvm_io_device dev;
>>>> struct kvm_io_device speaker_dev;
>>>> struct kvm *kvm;
>>>
>>> Why not remove the variable completely?
>>>
>>
>> didnt even think to completely remove the variable(figured it was used
>> somewhere).I will look at that and resend with removal of the variable
>> for you..
>
> Well if it was used, you ought to have changed all of the users, no?
>

at the moment I see:
(keep in mind my reading skills only go so far!)

  grep -Re base_address kvm/* -n
kvm/ioapic.c:276:       return ((addr >= ioapic->base_address &&
kvm/ioapic.c:277:                (addr < ioapic->base_address + 
IOAPIC_MEM_LENGTH)));
kvm/ioapic.c:371:       ioapic->base_address = IOAPIC_DEFAULT_BASE_ADDRESS;
kvm/ioapic.h:38:        u64 base_address;

so changing base_addresss; to base_address; gets kvm_ioapic_reset to 
function correctly as well as ioapic_in_range?
(but could be wrong)

Justin P. Mattock