From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Akihiro Nagai <akihiro.nagai.hw@hitachi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 3/6] perf branch trace: print pid and command
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:11:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D96072E.4060902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110401151313.GC2335@nowhere>
On 04/01/11 09:13, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:31:23AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 03/28/11 04:34, Akihiro Nagai wrote:
>>>> from is sample->ip? to is sample->addr? In the above example
>>>> 0x39d3015260 is the value from sample->addr, 1526f is sample->ip which
>>>> resolves to _dl_next_ld_env_entry from /lib64/ld-2.13.so.
>>> Yes.
>>> In this example, resolved address is only sample->ip (branch from).
>>> We need the resolved address of sample->addr (branch to) too, because
>>> both of them are addresses of execution code.
>>
>> Ok, now I understand. In that case add conversion of sample->addr to
>> symbols to perf-script.
>
> I agree that we should rather use perf script for branch dumps.
> Sorry Akihiro, I think we suggested you to create this dedicated
> perf branch by the past. But then perf script became the vanilla dump
> tool in the middle and it seems more suitable today.
>
> We can still create a perf branch later in order to produce some more
> advanced post-processing tools. But for sample dumps perf script (which starts
> to show itself as a misnomer BTW) seems to be the right place.
perf-dump?
>
> So, in this context, if we have PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR, we are going to always
> follow the ip with a "=>" and then resolve the address, etc...
>
> Yeah it makes sense for this default mode. But what about when we'll want
> a function graph kind of output? This will require a totally different
> layout. Also PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR may be used for different context in the
> future.
>
> Perhaps we want a kind of per evsel callback that makes its own
> interpretation of the pid/tid/dso/sym/etc... options asked by the
> user?
The print addr function can take the evsel as an input. It includes the
event type which can be used to decide what the address means.
>
> But well, we can start simple and make and just do the => trick
> if we have PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR and resolve addr if the user asked
> the sym. Then when we have the graph output, have these per evsel
> display callbacks.
There is another email thread about page faults. The user wants sample
address resolved to symbols. I was going to look into it next week when
I get back from vacation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-01 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 11:31 [PATCH -tip v3 0/6] perf: Introduce branch sub commands Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 11:31 ` [PATCH -tip v3 1/6] perf: new subcommand perf branch record Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 11:32 ` [PATCH -tip v3 2/6] perf branch: Introduce new sub command 'perf branch trace' Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 11:32 ` [PATCH -tip v3 3/6] perf branch trace: print pid and command Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 17:05 ` David Ahern
2011-03-25 10:14 ` Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-25 15:02 ` David Ahern
2011-03-28 10:34 ` Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-28 14:31 ` David Ahern
2011-04-01 15:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-01 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-01 15:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-04-01 17:11 ` David Ahern [this message]
2011-04-01 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 12:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-06 14:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-04-06 14:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-06 14:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-06 14:34 ` David Ahern
2011-04-06 14:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-06 14:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-06 14:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-06 17:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-04-04 10:00 ` Akihiro Nagai
2011-04-06 12:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-11 4:54 ` Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 11:32 ` [PATCH -tip v3 4/6] perf branch trace: print file path of the executed elf Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 11:32 ` [PATCH -tip v3 5/6] perf branch trace: print function+offset Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-24 11:32 ` [PATCH -tip v3 6/6] perf branch trace: add print all option Akihiro Nagai
2011-03-30 14:46 ` [PATCH -tip v3 0/6] perf: Introduce branch sub commands Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-01 10:57 ` Akihiro Nagai
2011-04-01 12:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-01 14:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-04-04 10:06 ` Akihiro Nagai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D96072E.4060902@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=2nddept-manager@sdl.hitachi.co.jp \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akihiro.nagai.hw@hitachi.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox