public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA45B12.2090506@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimJDxZ4qBRNnwE9L=3bfEU0WOhd6A@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-04-12 15:59, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2011/4/12 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>:
>> On 2011-04-12 14:51, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [ Fixed your empty CC list. ]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
>>> <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm noticing quite slower speed of my git rebase commands on my git
>>>> tree compared with 2.6.38 kernel.
>>>> I've  T61 with SSD disc drive, ext4 fs, and by default deadline disk
>>>> io scheduler
>>>> The counter showing the number of 'rebased' patches on top of master
>>>> is going much slower.
>>>> When I boot 2.6.38 kernel it's much faster.
>>>>
>>>> Is it a known problem - or do I need to make a bisect ?
>>>
>>> No, I don't think it's a known problem. Git bisect would be helpful,
>>> obviously.
>>
>> Definitely, interesting. Bisect would help. I'll try a similar workload
>> here and see if I see any differences. How big is your rebase, and what
>> are the runtimes (approximately) on .38 vs .39-rc?
>>
> 
> I've made just quick build with the small kernel without debug options
> enable - and the time is then equal with 2.6.38. So the difference is
> probably somewhere in debug build  -  I assume some debug option
> slowed down between 2.6.38 - 2.6.39 significantly.

Good, so it's down to debug. Thanks for testing.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-12 12:45 regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel Zdenek Kabelac
2011-04-12 12:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-12 13:07   ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:59     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-04-12 14:00       ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DA45B12.2090506@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox