From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:00:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA45B12.2090506@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimJDxZ4qBRNnwE9L=3bfEU0WOhd6A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2011-04-12 15:59, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> 2011/4/12 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>:
>> On 2011-04-12 14:51, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> [ Fixed your empty CC list. ]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Zdenek Kabelac
>>> <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm noticing quite slower speed of my git rebase commands on my git
>>>> tree compared with 2.6.38 kernel.
>>>> I've T61 with SSD disc drive, ext4 fs, and by default deadline disk
>>>> io scheduler
>>>> The counter showing the number of 'rebased' patches on top of master
>>>> is going much slower.
>>>> When I boot 2.6.38 kernel it's much faster.
>>>>
>>>> Is it a known problem - or do I need to make a bisect ?
>>>
>>> No, I don't think it's a known problem. Git bisect would be helpful,
>>> obviously.
>>
>> Definitely, interesting. Bisect would help. I'll try a similar workload
>> here and see if I see any differences. How big is your rebase, and what
>> are the runtimes (approximately) on .38 vs .39-rc?
>>
>
> I've made just quick build with the small kernel without debug options
> enable - and the time is then equal with 2.6.38. So the difference is
> probably somewhere in debug build - I assume some debug option
> slowed down between 2.6.38 - 2.6.39 significantly.
Good, so it's down to debug. Thanks for testing.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-12 12:45 regression - slow git rebase performance with 2.6.39-rcX kernel Zdenek Kabelac
2011-04-12 12:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-12 13:07 ` Jens Axboe
2011-04-12 13:59 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2011-04-12 14:00 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA45B12.2090506@fusionio.com \
--to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox