linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] futex: set FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT during demux for FUTEX_WAIT
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:11:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA746C5.1080804@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302807391.2744.6.camel@edumazet-laptop>



On 04/14/2011 11:56 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 11:45 -0700, Darren Hart a écrit :
>> The FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT flag was not getting set, causing the restart_block to
>> restart futex_wait() without a timeout after a signal.
>>
>> Commit b41277dc7a18ee332d in 2.6.38 introduced the regression by accidentally
>> removing the the FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT assignment from futex_wait() during the setup
>> of the restart block. It makes more sense to set the flag earlier during
>> do_futex() where the other flags are set, although futex_wait is the only user
>> of FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT as it is the only op using a relative timeout (an
>> unfortunately preexisting condition).
>>
>> Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32922
>>
>> V2: Added references to commit message.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
>> Reported-by: Tim Smith <tsmith201104@yahoo.com>
>> Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich <torsten.hilbrich@secunet.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> CC: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
>> CC: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/futex.c |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
>> index bda4157..6eac6b6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/futex.c
>> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
>> @@ -2589,6 +2589,9 @@ long do_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, ktime_t *timeout,
>>  			return -ENOSYS;
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (timeout)
>> +		flags |= FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT;
>> +
>>  	switch (cmd) {
>>  	case FUTEX_WAIT:
>>  		val3 = FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY;
> 
> 
> I dont agree with your fix. You add yet another test in futex fastpath.

I would say anything calling SYS_FUTEX is the futex slow path. The fast
path is cmpxchg in user space.

> 
> Prior commit  b41277dc7a18ee332d, this was done only in case of restart.

It was. My thinking was that it was inconsistent to have the
FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT only available if a signal was received and a restart
was required. This is the only place it is currently needed, but the
inconsistency concerns me.

> 
> Could we instead use 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index dfb924f..fe28dc2 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ retry:
>  	restart->futex.val = val;
>  	restart->futex.time = abs_time->tv64;
>  	restart->futex.bitset = bitset;
> -	restart->futex.flags = flags;
> +	restart->futex.flags = flags | FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT;
>  
>  	ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;

How about the following, it reuses an existing if block and ensure the
FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT is always set if a timeout is used. It means the
FLAG_HAS_TIMEOUT is not available in the other futex_* routines with
timeouts (futex_lock_pi and futex_wait_requeue_pi), but they use absolute
timeouts and don't need it for restart - I can agree to that, although
I'm not keen on FLAG_HAS_TIMEOUT not being set whenever timeout is. That
could be added in the same way to the other functions if needed in the
future.


diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 6eac6b6..0a7eefd 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1846,6 +1846,7 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, u32 val,
 		hrtimer_init_sleeper(to, current);
 		hrtimer_set_expires_range_ns(&to->timer, *abs_time,
 					     current->timer_slack_ns);
+		flags |= FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT;
 	}
 
 retry:



-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-14 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-14 16:58 [PATCH] futex: set FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT during demux for FUTEX_WAIT Darren Hart
2011-04-14 17:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 18:45   ` [PATCH V2] " Darren Hart
2011-04-14 18:56     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 19:11       ` Darren Hart [this message]
2011-04-14 19:48         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 20:45           ` Darren Hart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DA746C5.1080804@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).