public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>
To: Gottfried Haider <gottfried.haider@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	padovan@profusion.mobi
Subject: Re: [Regression] Bluetooth pairing does not work anymore in 2.6.39-rc3 (works in 2.6.38.3)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:47:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DAC5D2B.8000100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikihzxtp9ep3dE1zpPGKUGm1gij8Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/18/2011 12:34 AM, Gottfried Haider wrote:
>>> I checked: I have this commit in -rc3, so it must be something else here.
>> hmm... seems to be working over here with the latest Mainline. one thing  I
>> have notice though is the daemon is not starting during boot(systemd),
>> manually starting bluetoothd gets me to connect.(system is fedora 15).
>
> It was my fault after all:
>
> I had based my kernel config on 2.6.39-rc2 from Ubuntu's
> mainline-kernel PPA, and this doesn't have BT_L2CAP..
>
> Case closed.
>

thats alright...(your human!!!)

>
> I am just wondering: is it possible to make BT_L2CAP (and SCO?)
> default to yes when BT is compiled in or build as a module?

tweaking the kconfig can do this.

>
>> From commit 6427451: "The L2CAP layer is needed by almost all
> Bluetooth protocols and profiles. There isn't any real use case
> without having L2CAP loaded." Yet when I am doing oldconfig from a
> config that had L2CAP build as a module, I am getting these easily
> overlooked lines:
>
> L2CAP protocol support (BT_L2CAP) [N/y/?] (NEW)
> SCO links support (BT_SCO) [N/y/?] (NEW)
>
>
> cheers,
> gohai
>

Justin P. Mattock

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-18 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-16 16:38 [Regression] Bluetooth pairing does not work anymore in 2.6.39-rc3 (works in 2.6.38.3) Gottfried Haider
2011-04-16 17:01 ` Justin P. Mattock
2011-04-16 22:43   ` Gottfried Haider
2011-04-16 23:35     ` Justin P. Mattock
2011-04-18  7:34       ` Gottfried Haider
2011-04-18 15:47         ` Justin P. Mattock [this message]
2011-04-17 18:40 ` Maciej Rutecki
2011-04-18 13:21 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DAC5D2B.8000100@gmail.com \
    --to=justinmattock@gmail.com \
    --cc=gottfried.haider@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=padovan@profusion.mobi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox