public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Quadros <roger.quadros@nokia.com>
To: ext Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: <gregkh@suse.de>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	<m-sonasath@ti.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: composite: Allow function drivers to defer setup responses
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:30:17 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB03169.5090504@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.vt6vlrdf3l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>

On 04/19/2011 05:23 PM, ext Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:33:52 +0200, Roger Quadros <roger.quadros@nokia.com> wrote:
>> @@ -895,6 +904,14 @@ composite_setup(struct usb_gadget *gadget, const struct
>> usb_ctrlrequest *ctrl)
>> if (w_value && !f->set_alt)
>> break;
>> value = f->set_alt(f, w_index, w_value);
>> + if (value == USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS) {
>> + DBG(cdev,
>> + "%s: interface %d (%s) requested delayed status\n",
>> + __func__, intf, f->name);
>> + cdev->delayed_status++;
>
> Do we need it to be a counter? Won't simple flag do?

Counter because multiple interfaces could return USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS
and we need to know how many of them call usb_composite_setup_continue() before 
we actually complete the control transfer.

>
>> + DBG(cdev, "delayed_status count %d\n",
>> + cdev->delayed_status);
>> + }
>> break;
>> case USB_REQ_GET_INTERFACE:
>> if (ctrl->bRequestType != (USB_DIR_IN|USB_RECIP_INTERFACE))
>
>> @@ -1289,3 +1310,41 @@ void usb_composite_unregister(struct
>> usb_composite_driver *driver)
>> return;
>> usb_gadget_unregister_driver(&composite_driver);
>> }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * usb_composite_setup_continue() - Continue the delayed setup transfer
>> + * @cdev: the composite device who's setup transfer was delayed
>> + *
>> + * This function must be called by the USB function driver to continue
>> + * with the setup transfer's data/status phase in case it had requested to
>> + * delay the status phase. A USB function's setup handler (e.g. set_alt())
>> + * can request the composite framework to delay the setup request's status phase
>> + * by returning USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS.
>> + */
>> +void usb_composite_setup_continue(struct usb_composite_dev *cdev)
>> +{
>> + int value;
>> + struct usb_request *req = cdev->req;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + DBG(cdev, "%s\n", __func__);
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cdev->lock, flags);
>> +
>> + if (cdev->delayed_status == 0) {
>> + WARN(cdev, "%s: Unexpected call\n", __func__);
>> +
>> + } else if (--cdev->delayed_status == 0) {
>> + DBG(cdev, "%s: Completing delayed status\n", __func__);
>> + req->length = 0;
>> + req->zero = 1;
>> + value = usb_ep_queue(cdev->gadget->ep0, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + if (value < 0) {
>> + DBG(cdev, "ep_queue --> %d\n", value);
>> + req->status = 0;
>> + composite_setup_complete(cdev->gadget->ep0, req);
>> + }
>> + }Data/status stage.
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdev->lock, flags);
>> +}
>
> It's just my opinion but I dislike how it looks almost identical to the end
> of composite_setup. I would rather make it more general (take value as
> argument for instance) and let composite_setup() call it.

Yes that could be done. I'll try to do so in the next iteration.

>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/usb/composite.h @@ -37,6 +37,15 @@
>> #include <linux/usb/ch9.h>
>> #include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
>> +/*
>> + * USB function drivers should return USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS if they
>> + * wish to delay the status phase of the setup transfer till they are
>> + * ready. The composite framework will then delay the data/status phase
>> + * of the setup transfer till all the function drivers that requested for
>> + * USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STAUS, invoke usb_composite_setup_continue().
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#define USB_GADGET_DELAYED_STATUS 0x7fff /* Impossibly large value */
>
> I was wondering if we could change it to something like EDELAYED and put it to
> <include/linux/errno.h>. Just thinking, it may be a bad idea.
>

I would not do it.

Thanks for review.

-- 
regards,
-roger

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-21 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-19 13:33 [PATCH 0/2] usb: gadget: Make mass_storage pass USBCV MSC Compliance tests Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: gadget: composite: Allow function drivers to defer setup responses Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 14:14   ` Alan Stern
2011-04-21 13:27     ` Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 14:23   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-21 13:30     ` Roger Quadros [this message]
2011-05-09  9:42   ` Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: Make us pass USBCV MSC Compliance tests Roger Quadros
2011-04-19 14:33   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-19 20:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] usb: gadget: Make mass_storage " Sonasath, Moiz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DB03169.5090504@nokia.com \
    --to=roger.quadros@nokia.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m-sonasath@ti.com \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox