From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
crope@iki.fi, tvboxspy@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] get rid of on-stack dma buffers (part1)
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 12:59:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBD8367.6010901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110501123851.0ab6b799@schatten.dmk.lab>
Em 01-05-2011 07:38, Florian Mickler escreveu:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:30:52 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> Em 30-04-2011 15:54, Florian Mickler escreveu:
>>> Hi Mauro!
>>>
>>> I just saw that you picked up some patches of mine. What about these?
>>> These are actually tested...
>>
>> I'm still in process of applying the pending patches. Due to patchwork.kernel.org
>> troubles (including the loss of about 270 patches from its SQL database only
>> recovered yesterday[1]), I have a long backlog. So, I'm gradually applying the remaing
>> stuff. It will take some time though, and it will depend on patchwork mood, but I intend
>> to spend some time during this weekend to minimize the backlog.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mauro
>>
>> [1] The recover lost the email's body/SOB, so I've wrote a script to use my email
>> queue to get the data, using patchwork just to mark what patches were already
>> processed. This increses the time I have to spend on each patch, as I need to run
>> a script to match the patchwork patch with the patch ID inside my email queue.
>>
>
> Ah ok, no time pressure over here.. just wanted to make sure
> that these don't get lost.
I think I've applied your series yesterday. Yet, patchwork is currently at bad mood, and it is
not allowing to mark your patches as applied (and the previous series as superseded).
I suspect that I'll need to completely abandon patchwork and work on a new way for handling it
that doesn't depend (nor will update) patchwork.kernel.org.
Mauro.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-01 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-20 21:50 [PATCH 0/5] get rid of on-stack dma buffers (part1) Florian Mickler
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/5] [media] ec168: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [PATCH 2/5] [media] ce6230: get rid of on-stack dma buffer Florian Mickler
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [PATCH 3/5] [media] au6610: " Florian Mickler
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [PATCH 4/5] [media] lmedm04: correct indentation Florian Mickler
2011-03-20 21:50 ` [PATCH 5/5 v2] [media] lmedm04: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-04-30 18:54 ` [PATCH 0/5] get rid of on-stack dma buffers (part1) Florian Mickler
2011-04-30 22:30 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-05-01 10:38 ` Florian Mickler
2011-05-01 15:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBD8367.6010901@redhat.com \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=crope@iki.fi \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tvboxspy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).