From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le()
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 16:58:23 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DBFA78F.9060001@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303910411-15793-2-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Hi Akinobu,
On 27/04/11 23:20, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> m68knommu can't build ext4, udf, and ocfs2 due to the lack of
> find_next_bit_le().
>
> This implements find_next_bit_le() on m68knommu by duplicating the
> generic find_next_bit_le() in lib/find_next_bit.c.
Wouldn't the m68k specific implementation of this in
arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h be better?
(bitops_*.h is still on my list of files to clean up and
merge for m68k mmu and non-mmu)
Regards
Greg
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita<akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
> Cc: Greg Ungerer<gerg@uclinux.org>
> ---
>
> This patch should go into 2.6.39
>
> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> index 7d3779f..97d1d0c 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_no.h
> @@ -336,6 +336,50 @@ found_middle:
> return result + ffz(__swab32(tmp));
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
> + long size, unsigned long offset)
> +{
> + const unsigned long *p = addr;
> + unsigned long result = offset& ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1);
> + unsigned long tmp;
> +
> + if (offset>= size)
> + return size;
> + p += offset / BITS_PER_LONG;
> + size -= result;
> + offset&= (BITS_PER_LONG - 1UL);
> + if (offset) {
> + tmp = __swab32(*(p++));
> + tmp&= (~0UL<< offset);
> + if (size< BITS_PER_LONG)
> + goto found_first;
> + if (tmp)
> + goto found_middle;
> + size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> + result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + }
> +
> + while (size& ~(BITS_PER_LONG - 1)) {
> + tmp = *(p++);
> + if (tmp)
> + goto found_middle_swap;
> + result += BITS_PER_LONG;
> + size -= BITS_PER_LONG;
> + }
> + if (!size)
> + return result;
> + tmp = __swab32(*p);
> +found_first:
> + tmp&= (~0UL>> (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
> + if (tmp == 0UL) /* Are any bits set? */
> + return result + size; /* Nope. */
> +found_middle:
> + return result + __ffs(tmp);
> +
> +found_middle_swap:
> + return result + __ffs(__swab32(tmp));
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>
> #include<asm-generic/bitops/fls.h>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-27 13:20 [PATCH v3 0/7] remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT} Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] m68knommu: fix build error due to the lack of find_next_bit_le() Akinobu Mita
2011-05-03 6:58 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2011-05-03 9:11 ` Akinobu Mita
2011-05-03 9:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arch: add #define for each of optimized find bitops Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 14:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] bitops: add #ifndef for each of " Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arch: remove CONFIG_GENERIC_FIND_{NEXT_BIT,BIT_LE,LAST_BIT} Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm: use asm-generic/bitops/le.h Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] s390: " Akinobu Mita
2011-04-27 13:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] m68knommu: use generic find_next_bit_le() Akinobu Mita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DBFA78F.9060001@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox