linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Update x3][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v6)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:00:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC034CA.6000505@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104300004.02601.rjw@sisk.pl>

On 04/29/2011 03:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> +
> +/**
> + * enable_clock - Enable a device clock.
> + * @dev: Device whose clock is to be enabled.
> + * @con_id: Connection ID of the clock.
> + */
> +static void enable_clock(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> +{
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +
> +	clk = clk_get(dev, con_id);
> +	if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +		clk_enable(clk);
> +		clk_put(clk);
> +		dev_info(dev, "Runtime PM disabled, clock forced on.\n");
> +	}
> +}

This doesn't make much sense to me. You're getting a clock and then
enabling it and then putting the clock? How can you be so sure that
clk_put() won't one day do some kind of lower power mode on the clock
when clk_put() is called on it? I don't think anyone does anything
today, but I don't think its safe to assume that clk_put() won't try to
forcibly shut off the clock once all clk_get() callers have clk_put().

Perhaps we should document the meaning of clk_enable() followed by
clk_put() somewhere instead?

> +
> +/**
> + * disable_clock - Disable a device clock.
> + * @dev: Device whose clock is to be disabled.
> + * @con_id: Connection ID of the clock.
> + */
> +static void disable_clock(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> +{
> +	struct clk *clk;
> +
> +	clk = clk_get(dev, con_id);
> +	if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +		clk_disable(clk);
> +		clk_put(clk);
> +		dev_info(dev, "Runtime PM disabled, clock forced off.\n");
> +	}
> +}

This might not be as bad, but it looks like a similar problem.

> -
> -static int platform_bus_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> -			       unsigned long action, void *data)
> -{
> -	struct device *dev = data;
> -	struct clk *clk;
> -
> -	dev_dbg(dev, "platform_bus_notify() %ld !\n", action);
> -
> -	switch (action) {
> -	case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
> -		clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> -		if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> -			clk_enable(clk);
> -			clk_put(clk);
> -			dev_info(dev, "runtime pm disabled, clock forced on\n");
> -		}
> -		break;
> -	case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
> -		clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> -		if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> -			clk_disable(clk);
> -			clk_put(clk);
> -			dev_info(dev, "runtime pm disabled, clock forced off\n");
> -		}

Ah ok I see that it's coming from here.

BTW, whatever is in linux-next is failing to compile:

drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:391: error: 'con_id' undeclared (first
use in this function)
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:391: error: (Each undeclared identifier
is reported only once
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:391: error: for each function it appears in.)

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-03 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-13  0:05 [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 14:17 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-13 16:15   ` Grant Likely
2011-04-14 23:12     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 14:38       ` Grant Likely
2011-04-15 14:39       ` Alan Stern
2011-04-14 18:20 ` Magnus Damm
2011-04-14 22:45   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 14:34     ` Alan Stern
2011-04-15 23:18       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 17:15         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-16 23:12           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 23:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Remove __weak definitions of platform PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 23:18   ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] shmobile: Use power domains for platform runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 23:19   ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM / Platform: Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 17:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Kevin Hilman
2011-04-16 23:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:36   ` [PATCH 1/9] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:37   ` [PATCH 2/9] PM: Export platform bus type's default PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:38   ` [PATCH 3/9] shmobile: Use power domains for platform runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:38   ` [PATCH 4/9] PM / Platform: Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:39   ` [PATCH 5/9] OMAP2+ / PM: Move runtime PM implementation to use power domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:40   ` [PATCH 6/9] PM / Runtime: Add subsystem data field to struct dev_pm_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:42   ` [PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Add generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-18 19:59     ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 10:18       ` Magnus Damm
2011-04-19 21:42         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 21:59           ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-19 22:10             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 22:20               ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-19 22:50                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 10:58     ` [linux-pm] [PATCH " Mark Brown
2011-04-19 21:35       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-20 11:57         ` Mark Brown
2011-04-16 23:43   ` [PATCH 8/9] OMAP1 / PM: Use generic clock manipulation routines " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-18  8:18     ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-18 19:57       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:44   ` [PATCH 9/9] PM: Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:30   ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:36     ` [PATCH 1/9] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:37     ` [PATCH 2/9] PM: Export platform bus type's default PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:38     ` [PATCH 3/9] shmobile: Use power domains for platform runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:39     ` [PATCH 4/9] PM / Platform: Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:41     ` [PATCH 5/9] OMAP2+ / PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:42     ` [PATCH 6/9] PM / Runtime: Add subsystem data field to struct dev_pm_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:42     ` [PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-27 21:48       ` [Update][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-27 23:04         ` Colin Cross
2011-04-28  0:58           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-28  1:06             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-28  1:33               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-28 19:36                 ` [Update x2][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-29 19:35                   ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-29 20:29                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-29 22:04                       ` [Update x3][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 17:00                         ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-05-03 17:38                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-29 20:50             ` [Update][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v3) Grant Likely
2011-04-29 21:07               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:43     ` [PATCH 8/9] OMAP1 / PM: Use generic clock manipulation routines for runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-16 10:16       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-16 18:26         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:44     ` [PATCH 9/9] PM: Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 23:36     ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains (v2) Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC034CA.6000505@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ccross@google.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).