From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Update x3][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v6)
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 10:00:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC034CA.6000505@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104300004.02601.rjw@sisk.pl>
On 04/29/2011 03:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> +
> +/**
> + * enable_clock - Enable a device clock.
> + * @dev: Device whose clock is to be enabled.
> + * @con_id: Connection ID of the clock.
> + */
> +static void enable_clock(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> +{
> + struct clk *clk;
> +
> + clk = clk_get(dev, con_id);
> + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + clk_enable(clk);
> + clk_put(clk);
> + dev_info(dev, "Runtime PM disabled, clock forced on.\n");
> + }
> +}
This doesn't make much sense to me. You're getting a clock and then
enabling it and then putting the clock? How can you be so sure that
clk_put() won't one day do some kind of lower power mode on the clock
when clk_put() is called on it? I don't think anyone does anything
today, but I don't think its safe to assume that clk_put() won't try to
forcibly shut off the clock once all clk_get() callers have clk_put().
Perhaps we should document the meaning of clk_enable() followed by
clk_put() somewhere instead?
> +
> +/**
> + * disable_clock - Disable a device clock.
> + * @dev: Device whose clock is to be disabled.
> + * @con_id: Connection ID of the clock.
> + */
> +static void disable_clock(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
> +{
> + struct clk *clk;
> +
> + clk = clk_get(dev, con_id);
> + if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> + clk_disable(clk);
> + clk_put(clk);
> + dev_info(dev, "Runtime PM disabled, clock forced off.\n");
> + }
> +}
This might not be as bad, but it looks like a similar problem.
> -
> -static int platform_bus_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
> - unsigned long action, void *data)
> -{
> - struct device *dev = data;
> - struct clk *clk;
> -
> - dev_dbg(dev, "platform_bus_notify() %ld !\n", action);
> -
> - switch (action) {
> - case BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER:
> - clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> - if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> - clk_enable(clk);
> - clk_put(clk);
> - dev_info(dev, "runtime pm disabled, clock forced on\n");
> - }
> - break;
> - case BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER:
> - clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
> - if (!IS_ERR(clk)) {
> - clk_disable(clk);
> - clk_put(clk);
> - dev_info(dev, "runtime pm disabled, clock forced off\n");
> - }
Ah ok I see that it's coming from here.
BTW, whatever is in linux-next is failing to compile:
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:391: error: 'con_id' undeclared (first
use in this function)
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:391: error: (Each undeclared identifier
is reported only once
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c:391: error: for each function it appears in.)
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-03 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-13 0:05 [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-13 14:17 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-13 16:15 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-14 23:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 14:38 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-15 14:39 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-14 18:20 ` Magnus Damm
2011-04-14 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-15 14:34 ` Alan Stern
2011-04-15 23:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 17:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-04-16 23:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 23:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Remove __weak definitions of platform PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 23:18 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] shmobile: Use power domains for platform runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-14 23:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] PM / Platform: Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 17:17 ` [RFC][PATCH] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Kevin Hilman
2011-04-16 23:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/9] PM: Export platform bus type's default PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] shmobile: Use power domains for platform runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:38 ` [PATCH 4/9] PM / Platform: Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:39 ` [PATCH 5/9] OMAP2+ / PM: Move runtime PM implementation to use power domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:40 ` [PATCH 6/9] PM / Runtime: Add subsystem data field to struct dev_pm_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:42 ` [PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Add generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-18 19:59 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 10:18 ` Magnus Damm
2011-04-19 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 21:59 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-19 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 22:20 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-19 22:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-19 10:58 ` [linux-pm] [PATCH " Mark Brown
2011-04-19 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-20 11:57 ` Mark Brown
2011-04-16 23:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] OMAP1 / PM: Use generic clock manipulation routines " Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-18 8:18 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-18 19:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-16 23:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] PM: Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:30 ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 1/9] PM: Make power domain callbacks take precedence over subsystem ones Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:37 ` [PATCH 2/9] PM: Export platform bus type's default PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:38 ` [PATCH 3/9] shmobile: Use power domains for platform runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:39 ` [PATCH 4/9] PM / Platform: Use generic runtime PM callbacks directly Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] OMAP2+ / PM: move runtime PM implementation to use device power domains Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:42 ` [PATCH 6/9] PM / Runtime: Add subsystem data field to struct dev_pm_info Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:42 ` [PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v2) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-27 21:48 ` [Update][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-27 23:04 ` Colin Cross
2011-04-28 0:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-28 1:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-28 1:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-28 19:36 ` [Update x2][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v5) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-29 19:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-29 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-29 22:04 ` [Update x3][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v6) Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 17:00 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-05-03 17:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-29 20:50 ` [Update][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Generic clock manipulation rountines for runtime PM (v3) Grant Likely
2011-04-29 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:43 ` [PATCH 8/9] OMAP1 / PM: Use generic clock manipulation routines for runtime PM Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-16 10:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-16 18:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 21:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] PM: Revert "driver core: platform_bus: allow runtime override of dev_pm_ops" Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-24 23:36 ` [PATCH 0/9] PM: Rework shmobile and OMAP runtime PM using power domains (v2) Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DC034CA.6000505@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).