Re: [PATCH V4] tty/serial: add support for Xilinx PS UART

[Michal Simek <michal.simek@petalogix.com>]

johnlinn@comcast.net wrote:
>>> Yes I'll have a look at it, sorry for the hassle.  
>>>
>>> I'm assuming I need to try it against linus
>>> tree as something may have changed. Or some other tree?
>> Or you are assuimg NO_IRQ is defined everywhere which it isn't. The
>> kernel mainstream just uses zero as intended not a define for it.
>>
>> Alan
> 
> Ahh... maybe I see, it's only defined in ARM and that's what I was building
> for.  I'm a little slow sometimes, but I'll get there.
> 
> Gotcha, replace with 0. Thanks.

I don't agree with this change. NO_IRQ for microblaze, arm and other is -1. BTW: 
For ppc is 0. Using NO_IRQ seems to me reasonable.

you are including linux/irq.h which include asm/irq.h for all platforms except 
s390. I think that is better to find out where the real problem is instead of 
using any hardcoded value.

If I look at xuartps_get_port function then you don't even need to initialize it 
to NO_IRQ because if there is no IRQ connected driver is not probed. That's why
"port->irq = res2->start;" is enough.
I would suggest to completely remove that line from xuartps_get_port


Michal




-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663