public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Dietsche <gregory.dietsche@cuw.edu>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, mfuzzey@gmail.com, tom.leiming@gmail.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: fix warning in usbtest module
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 14:12:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC6EB3B.8070604@cuw.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1105081033140.30441-100000@netrider.rowland.org>

On 05/08/2011 09:37 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 7 May 2011, Greg Dietsche wrote:
>
>    
>> On amd64 unsigned is not as wide as pointer and this causes
>> a compiler warning. Switching to uintptr_t fixes the problem
>> in an arch independent manner.
>>      
> People tend to prefer to see non-typedef'ed type names, whenever
> possible.  In this case, it would be enough to change the type to
> unsigned long.
>
> Lots of code throughout the kernel stores pointer values in unsigned
> long variables.  I've never heard any recommendation for using
> uintptr_t instead.
>
>    
I was leaning towards unsigned long at first too, but a several things 
made me reconsider:
1) uintptr_t adapts correctly to the size of a pointer on all 
architectures per C99
2) I greped the kernel source and found a number of instances where 
uintptr_t is used
3) unsigned long is technically too wide (though this is better than too 
small...) for some architectures

If the general consensus is that unsigned long is a better choice for 
the kernel, I will update my patch. I do, however think that uintptr_t 
is the best choice from a technical perspective and prefer it over 
unsigned long.

Thanks,
Greg


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-08 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-08  3:27 [PATCH] usb: fix warning in usbtest module Greg Dietsche
2011-05-08 14:37 ` Alan Stern
2011-05-08 19:12   ` Greg Dietsche [this message]
2011-05-08 22:58     ` Greg KH
2011-05-09  3:51       ` [PATCH] usb: fix warning in usbtest module v2 Greg Dietsche
2011-05-09  4:02       ` [PATCH] usb: fix warning in usbtest module Greg Dietsche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC6EB3B.8070604@cuw.edu \
    --to=gregory.dietsche@cuw.edu \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfuzzey@gmail.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox