public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"mikew@google.com" <mikew@google.com>,
	"a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"fweisbec@gmail.com" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net" 
	<dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] pstore: EFI Support
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:44:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DC9A3A2.20000@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C4C569E8A4B9B42A84A977CF070A35B2C16FB4815@USINDEVS01.corp.hds.com>

On 05/10/2011 12:18 PM, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
>> Btw, is this case of the possibility for APEI of corrupting NVRAM
>> storage something you actually experienced on a real machine or simply a
>> conclusion from looking at APEI code doing ioremap()?
>
> I simply concluded from looking at ioremap() of APEI code.
>

The thing is that you're effectively betting that the EFI method will be 
less broken than our kernels.  That is not at all given...

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-10 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-10 15:00 [RFC][PATCH] pstore: EFI Support Seiji Aguchi
2011-05-10 16:11 ` Greg KH
2011-05-10 16:57   ` Borislav Petkov
2011-05-10 19:18     ` Seiji Aguchi
2011-05-10 20:44       ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-05-11 13:09   ` Américo Wang
2011-05-11 14:27     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-12  1:46       ` Matthew Garrett
2011-05-10 20:52 ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DC9A3A2.20000@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikew@google.com \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    --cc=seiji.aguchi@hds.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox