* [PATCH v2] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix
@ 2011-05-14 6:20 Cheng Xu
2011-05-15 8:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 10:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rt_rq runtime leakage bug tip-bot for Cheng Xu
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cheng Xu @ 2011-05-14 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, Paul Mckenney, LKML
This patch is to fix the real-time scheduler bug reported at
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/26/13. That is, when running multiple real-time
threads on every logical CPUs and then turning off one CPU, the kernel will
bug at function __disable_runtime().
Function __disable_runtime() bugs and reports leakage of rt_rq runtime. The
root cause is __disable_runtime() assumes it iterates through all the existing
rt_rq's while walking rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, which actually contains only
runnable rt_rq's. This problem also applies to __enable_runtime() and
print_rt_stats().
The patch is based on above analysis, appears to fix the problem, but is only
lightly tested.
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng Xu <chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index e7cebdc..f8fcf82 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+typedef struct task_group *rt_rq_iter_t;
+
+#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
+ for (iter = list_entry_rcu(task_groups.next, typeof(*iter), list); \
+ (&iter->list != &task_groups) && \
+ (rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)]); \
+ iter = list_entry_rcu(iter->list.next, typeof(*iter), list))
+
static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
list_add_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list,
@@ -288,6 +296,11 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+typedef struct rt_rq *rt_rq_iter_t;
+
+#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
+ for ((void) iter, rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
+
static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
}
@@ -402,12 +415,13 @@ next:
static void __disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
struct root_domain *rd = rq->rd;
+ rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
return;
- for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
+ for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
s64 want;
int i;
@@ -487,6 +501,7 @@ static void disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
+ rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
@@ -495,7 +510,7 @@ static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
/*
* Reset each runqueue's bandwidth settings
*/
- for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
+ for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
@@ -1796,10 +1811,11 @@ extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
+ rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, cpu_rq(cpu))
+ for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, cpu_rq(cpu))
print_rt_rq(m, cpu, rt_rq);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix
2011-05-14 6:20 [PATCH v2] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix Cheng Xu
@ 2011-05-15 8:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 10:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rt_rq runtime leakage bug tip-bot for Cheng Xu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2011-05-15 8:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cheng Xu; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, LKML
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 02:20:02PM +0800, Cheng Xu wrote:
> This patch is to fix the real-time scheduler bug reported at
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/26/13. That is, when running multiple real-time
> threads on every logical CPUs and then turning off one CPU, the kernel will
> bug at function __disable_runtime().
>
> Function __disable_runtime() bugs and reports leakage of rt_rq runtime. The
> root cause is __disable_runtime() assumes it iterates through all the existing
> rt_rq's while walking rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, which actually contains only
> runnable rt_rq's. This problem also applies to __enable_runtime() and
> print_rt_stats().
>
> The patch is based on above analysis, appears to fix the problem, but is only
> lightly tested.
>
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cheng Xu <chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Works for me!
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index e7cebdc..f8fcf82 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
> }
>
> +typedef struct task_group *rt_rq_iter_t;
> +
> +#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
> + for (iter = list_entry_rcu(task_groups.next, typeof(*iter), list); \
> + (&iter->list != &task_groups) && \
> + (rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)]); \
> + iter = list_entry_rcu(iter->list.next, typeof(*iter), list))
> +
> static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> {
> list_add_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list,
> @@ -288,6 +296,11 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
> }
>
> +typedef struct rt_rq *rt_rq_iter_t;
> +
> +#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
> + for ((void) iter, rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
> +
> static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
> {
> }
> @@ -402,12 +415,13 @@ next:
> static void __disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
> {
> struct root_domain *rd = rq->rd;
> + rt_rq_iter_t iter;
> struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
>
> if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
> return;
>
> - for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
> + for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
> struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
> s64 want;
> int i;
> @@ -487,6 +501,7 @@ static void disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
>
> static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
> {
> + rt_rq_iter_t iter;
> struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
>
> if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
> @@ -495,7 +510,7 @@ static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
> /*
> * Reset each runqueue's bandwidth settings
> */
> - for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
> + for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
> struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
>
> raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
> @@ -1796,10 +1811,11 @@ extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
>
> static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
> {
> + rt_rq_iter_t iter;
> struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, cpu_rq(cpu))
> + for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, cpu_rq(cpu))
> print_rt_rq(m, cpu, rt_rq);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> --
> 1.7.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rt_rq runtime leakage bug
2011-05-14 6:20 [PATCH v2] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix Cheng Xu
2011-05-15 8:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2011-05-16 10:37 ` tip-bot for Cheng Xu
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Cheng Xu @ 2011-05-16 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, paulmck, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, chengxu, tglx,
mingo
Commit-ID: ec514c487c3d4b652943da7b0afbc094eee08cfa
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ec514c487c3d4b652943da7b0afbc094eee08cfa
Author: Cheng Xu <chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Sat, 14 May 2011 14:20:02 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:00:54 +0200
sched: Fix rt_rq runtime leakage bug
This patch is to fix the real-time scheduler bug reported at:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/26/13
That is, when running multiple real-time threads on every logical CPUs
and then turning off one CPU, the kernel will bug at function
__disable_runtime().
Function __disable_runtime() bugs and reports leakage of rt_rq runtime.
The root cause is __disable_runtime() assumes it iterates through all
the existing rt_rq's while walking rq->leaf_rt_rq_list, which actually
contains only runnable rt_rq's. This problem also applies to
__enable_runtime() and print_rt_stats().
The patch is based on above analysis, appears to fix the problem, but is
only lightly tested.
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cheng Xu <chengxu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4DCE1F12.6040609@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index e7cebdc..f8fcf82 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -183,6 +183,14 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
return ktime_to_ns(rt_rq->tg->rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+typedef struct task_group *rt_rq_iter_t;
+
+#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
+ for (iter = list_entry_rcu(task_groups.next, typeof(*iter), list); \
+ (&iter->list != &task_groups) && \
+ (rt_rq = iter->rt_rq[cpu_of(rq)]); \
+ iter = list_entry_rcu(iter->list.next, typeof(*iter), list))
+
static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
list_add_rcu(&rt_rq->leaf_rt_rq_list,
@@ -288,6 +296,11 @@ static inline u64 sched_rt_period(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
return ktime_to_ns(def_rt_bandwidth.rt_period);
}
+typedef struct rt_rq *rt_rq_iter_t;
+
+#define for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) \
+ for ((void) iter, rt_rq = &rq->rt; rt_rq; rt_rq = NULL)
+
static inline void list_add_leaf_rt_rq(struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
{
}
@@ -402,12 +415,13 @@ next:
static void __disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
struct root_domain *rd = rq->rd;
+ rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
return;
- for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
+ for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
s64 want;
int i;
@@ -487,6 +501,7 @@ static void disable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
{
+ rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
if (unlikely(!scheduler_running))
@@ -495,7 +510,7 @@ static void __enable_runtime(struct rq *rq)
/*
* Reset each runqueue's bandwidth settings
*/
- for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, rq) {
+ for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, rq) {
struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b = sched_rt_bandwidth(rt_rq);
raw_spin_lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
@@ -1796,10 +1811,11 @@ extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
static void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
+ rt_rq_iter_t iter;
struct rt_rq *rt_rq;
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_leaf_rt_rq(rt_rq, cpu_rq(cpu))
+ for_each_rt_rq(rt_rq, iter, cpu_rq(cpu))
print_rt_rq(m, cpu, rt_rq);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-16 10:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-14 6:20 [PATCH v2] sched: rt_rq runtime leakage bug fix Cheng Xu
2011-05-15 8:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 10:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Fix rt_rq runtime leakage bug tip-bot for Cheng Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox