* incompatible struct pci_root_info?
@ 2011-05-14 17:02 Németh Márton
2011-05-14 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Németh Márton @ 2011-05-14 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Tony Luck,
Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64
Cc: Julia Lawall, LKML
Hello,
I have found struct pci_root_info declaration at three different places in Linux
kernel 2.6.39-rc6. Two of them are in arch/x86 and one of them is in arch/ia64.
arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.h:8:
struct pci_root_info {
char name[12];
unsigned int res_num;
struct resource res[RES_NUM];
int bus_min;
int bus_max;
int node;
int link;
};
arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:10:
struct pci_root_info {
struct acpi_device *bridge;
char *name;
unsigned int res_num;
struct resource *res;
struct pci_bus *bus;
int busnum;
};
arch/ia64/pci/pci.c:133:
struct pci_root_info {
struct acpi_device *bridge;
struct pci_controller *controller;
char *name;
};
As far as I know it is OK to have different types on different architectures
with the same name. Is there any reason behind having two struct pci_root_info
delcaration in arch/x86?
Regards,
Márton Németh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: incompatible struct pci_root_info? 2011-05-14 17:02 incompatible struct pci_root_info? Németh Márton @ 2011-05-14 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin 2011-05-15 19:09 ` [PATCH] x86 pci acpi: rename struct pci_root_info Németh Márton 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2011-05-14 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Németh Márton Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, x86, Tony Luck, Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64, Julia Lawall, LKML On 05/14/2011 10:02 AM, Németh Márton wrote: > > As far as I know it is OK to have different types on different architectures > with the same name. Is there any reason behind having two struct pci_root_info > delcaration in arch/x86? > It looks like a namespace collision; the same name being used for that is really two different types. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] x86 pci acpi: rename struct pci_root_info 2011-05-14 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin @ 2011-05-15 19:09 ` Németh Márton 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Németh Márton @ 2011-05-15 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, x86, Tony Luck, Fenghua Yu, linux-ia64, Julia Lawall, LKML From: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu> Rename struct pci_root_info to struct acpi_pci_root_info in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c because there is already a struct pci_root_info declared in arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.h . They both belnog to x86 architecture and the two declarations differ, so after rename each will have a unique name. Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <nm127@freemail.hu> --- --- linux-2.6.39-rc7/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c.orig 2011-05-10 04:33:54.000000000 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.39-rc7/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c 2011-05-15 17:02:52.000000000 +0200 @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ #include <asm/numa.h> #include <asm/pci_x86.h> -struct pci_root_info { +struct acpi_pci_root_info { struct acpi_device *bridge; char *name; unsigned int res_num; @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ resource_to_addr(struct acpi_resource *r static acpi_status count_resource(struct acpi_resource *acpi_res, void *data) { - struct pci_root_info *info = data; + struct acpi_pci_root_info *info = data; struct acpi_resource_address64 addr; acpi_status status; @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ count_resource(struct acpi_resource *acp static acpi_status setup_resource(struct acpi_resource *acpi_res, void *data) { - struct pci_root_info *info = data; + struct acpi_pci_root_info *info = data; struct resource *res; struct acpi_resource_address64 addr; acpi_status status; @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static bool resource_contains(struct res return false; } -static void coalesce_windows(struct pci_root_info *info, int type) +static void coalesce_windows(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info, int type) { int i, j; struct resource *res1, *res2; @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void coalesce_windows(struct pci_ } } -static void add_resources(struct pci_root_info *info) +static void add_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info) { int i; struct resource *res, *root, *conflict; @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void get_current_resources(struct acpi_device *device, int busnum, int domain, struct pci_bus *bus) { - struct pci_root_info info; + struct acpi_pci_root_info info; size_t size; if (pci_use_crs) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-15 19:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-05-14 17:02 incompatible struct pci_root_info? Németh Márton 2011-05-14 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin 2011-05-15 19:09 ` [PATCH] x86 pci acpi: rename struct pci_root_info Németh Márton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox