From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: MMU: abstract the operation of rmap
Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 05:38:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DCEF659.4010101@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DCEF5B1.3050706@cn.fujitsu.com>
Abstract the operation of rmap, then we can use it for the reverse mapping
of parent pte in the later patch
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 971e2d2..8da77b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -590,28 +590,9 @@ static int mapping_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t large_gfn)
}
/*
- * Take gfn and return the reverse mapping to it.
- */
-
-static unsigned long *gfn_to_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, int level)
-{
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
- struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
-
- slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
- if (likely(level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
- return &slot->rmap[gfn - slot->base_gfn];
-
- linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
-
- return &linfo->rmap_pde;
-}
-
-/*
* Reverse mapping data structures:
*
- * If rmapp bit zero is zero, then rmapp point to the shadw page table entry
- * that points to page_address(page).
+ * If rmapp bit zero is zero, then rmapp point to the spte.
*
* If rmapp bit zero is one, (then rmap & ~1) points to a struct kvm_rmap_desc
* containing more mappings.
@@ -620,18 +601,11 @@ static unsigned long *gfn_to_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, int level)
* the spte was not added.
*
*/
-static int rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+static int __rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, unsigned long *rmapp)
{
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
struct kvm_rmap_desc *desc;
- unsigned long *rmapp;
int i, count = 0;
- if (!is_rmap_spte(*spte))
- return count;
- sp = page_header(__pa(spte));
- kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt, gfn);
- rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(vcpu->kvm, gfn, sp->role.level);
if (!*rmapp) {
rmap_printk("rmap_add: %p %llx 0->1\n", spte, *spte);
*rmapp = (unsigned long)spte;
@@ -660,7 +634,33 @@ static int rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
return count;
}
-static void rmap_desc_remove_entry(unsigned long *rmapp,
+static u64 *__rmap_next(unsigned long *rmapp, u64 *spte)
+{
+ struct kvm_rmap_desc *desc;
+ u64 *prev_spte;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!*rmapp)
+ return NULL;
+ else if (!(*rmapp & 1)) {
+ if (!spte)
+ return (u64 *)*rmapp;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+ desc = (struct kvm_rmap_desc *)(*rmapp & ~1ul);
+ prev_spte = NULL;
+ while (desc) {
+ for (i = 0; i < RMAP_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i) {
+ if (prev_spte == spte)
+ return desc->sptes[i];
+ prev_spte = desc->sptes[i];
+ }
+ desc = desc->more;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static void __rmap_desc_remove_entry(unsigned long *rmapp,
struct kvm_rmap_desc *desc,
int i,
struct kvm_rmap_desc *prev_desc)
@@ -683,18 +683,12 @@ static void rmap_desc_remove_entry(unsigned long *rmapp,
mmu_free_rmap_desc(desc);
}
-static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
+static void __rmap_remove(u64 *spte, unsigned long *rmapp)
{
struct kvm_rmap_desc *desc;
struct kvm_rmap_desc *prev_desc;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
- gfn_t gfn;
- unsigned long *rmapp;
int i;
- sp = page_header(__pa(spte));
- gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt);
- rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(kvm, gfn, sp->role.level);
if (!*rmapp) {
printk(KERN_ERR "rmap_remove: %p 0->BUG\n", spte);
BUG();
@@ -712,7 +706,7 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
while (desc) {
for (i = 0; i < RMAP_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
if (desc->sptes[i] == spte) {
- rmap_desc_remove_entry(rmapp,
+ __rmap_desc_remove_entry(rmapp,
desc, i,
prev_desc);
return;
@@ -725,6 +719,54 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
}
}
+/*
+ * Take gfn and return the reverse mapping to it.
+ */
+static unsigned long *gfn_to_rmap(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, int level)
+{
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+ struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
+
+ slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+ if (likely(level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL))
+ return &slot->rmap[gfn - slot->base_gfn];
+
+ linfo = lpage_info_slot(gfn, slot, level);
+
+ return &linfo->rmap_pde;
+}
+
+static int rmap_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+ unsigned long *rmapp;
+
+ if (!is_rmap_spte(*spte))
+ return 0;
+
+ sp = page_header(__pa(spte));
+ kvm_mmu_page_set_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt, gfn);
+ rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(vcpu->kvm, gfn, sp->role.level);
+ return __rmap_add(vcpu, spte, rmapp);
+}
+
+static u64 *rmap_next(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, u64 *spte)
+{
+ return __rmap_next(rmapp, spte);
+}
+
+static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+ gfn_t gfn;
+ unsigned long *rmapp;
+
+ sp = page_header(__pa(spte));
+ gfn = kvm_mmu_page_get_gfn(sp, spte - sp->spt);
+ rmapp = gfn_to_rmap(kvm, gfn, sp->role.level);
+ __rmap_remove(spte, rmapp);
+}
+
static int set_spte_track_bits(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
pfn_t pfn;
@@ -752,32 +794,6 @@ static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
-static u64 *rmap_next(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp, u64 *spte)
-{
- struct kvm_rmap_desc *desc;
- u64 *prev_spte;
- int i;
-
- if (!*rmapp)
- return NULL;
- else if (!(*rmapp & 1)) {
- if (!spte)
- return (u64 *)*rmapp;
- return NULL;
- }
- desc = (struct kvm_rmap_desc *)(*rmapp & ~1ul);
- prev_spte = NULL;
- while (desc) {
- for (i = 0; i < RMAP_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i) {
- if (prev_spte == spte)
- return desc->sptes[i];
- prev_spte = desc->sptes[i];
- }
- desc = desc->more;
- }
- return NULL;
-}
-
static int rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
{
unsigned long *rmapp;
--
1.7.4.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-14 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-14 21:35 [PATCH 1/7] KVM: MMU: optimize pte write path if don't have protected sp Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-14 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: use __copy_to_user/__clear_user to write guest page Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-14 21:37 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: fix uninitialized warning Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-14 21:38 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-05-14 21:44 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: MMU: remove the arithmetic of parent pte rmap Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-15 8:23 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-15 8:44 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-14 21:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: MMU: cleanup for kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-14 21:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: cleanup for dropping parent pte Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-15 8:20 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: MMU: optimize pte write path if don't have protected sp Avi Kivity
2011-05-15 8:33 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-05-15 8:38 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DCEF659.4010101@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox