public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] x86, cpu: Add CPU flags for SMEP
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:56:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD1D5EB.3070602@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305581685-5144-2-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

On 05/16/2011 02:34 PM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> 
> Add support for newly documented SMEP (Supervisor Mode Execution Protection) CPU
> feature flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c   |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 50c0d30..e773f13 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PLN		(7*32+ 5) /* Intel Power Limit Notification */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PTS		(7*32+ 6) /* Intel Package Thermal Status */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_DTS		(7*32+ 7) /* Digital Thermal Sensor */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SMEP	(7*32+ 8) /* Supervisor Mode Execution Protection*/
>  
>  /* Virtualization flags: Linux defined, word 8 */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_TPR_SHADOW  (8*32+ 0) /* Intel TPR Shadow */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> index c7f64e6..2de3aea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ void __cpuinit init_scattered_cpuid_features(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_PTS,		CR_EAX, 6, 0x00000006, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF,	CR_ECX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_EPB,		CR_ECX, 3, 0x00000006, 0 },
> +		{ X86_FEATURE_SMEP,		CR_EBX, 7, 0x00000007, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT,		CR_EAX,	0, 0x0000000d, 1 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_CPB,		CR_EDX, 9, 0x80000007, 0 },
>  		{ X86_FEATURE_NPT,		CR_EDX, 0, 0x8000000a, 0 },

The level 7 flags are not considered "scattered"; they have their own
word; please use it.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-17  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-16 21:34 [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature Fenghua Yu
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86, cpu: Add CPU flags for SMEP Fenghua Yu
2011-05-17  1:56   ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86, cpu: Add SMEP CPU feature in CR4 Fenghua Yu
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86, head_32/64.S: Enable SMEP Fenghua Yu
2011-05-17  2:10   ` Matthew Garrett
2011-05-17 23:08     ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-17 23:12       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-18  2:57         ` Yu, Fenghua
2011-05-16 21:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/kernel/common.c: Disable SMEP by kernel option nosmep Fenghua Yu
2011-05-16 22:01   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-16 21:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable SMEP CPU Feature H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-17  7:05   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  9:15     ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17  9:29       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  9:32         ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 10:46           ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17 11:34             ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 11:38               ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17 11:44                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 11:47                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-05-17 11:49                     ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-17 11:50                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19  6:10               ` Tian, Kevin
2011-05-19  6:41                 ` Shan, Haitao
2011-05-20  8:21                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-17  9:16   ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD1D5EB.3070602@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox