From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events() properly wait for work cancellation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:26:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD39EE1.7080006@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=0_bv7s6=i2v-iP0vQmHHT3=tm8w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2011-05-18 11:46, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Just make the semaphore protect the count - and you're done.
>>
>> Yeah, with that gone, we don't even need the open-coding inside
>> disk_check_events(). It can simply call syncing block and unblock.
>> But, do you want that in -rc7? Unnecessarily complicated as the
>> current code may be, converting the lock to mutex is a larger change
>> than adding an outer mutex and I think it would be better to do that
>> during the next cycle.
>
> Quite frankly. right now I think I need to just release 2.6.39, and
> then for 2.6.40 merge the trivial
>
> mutex_lock(&ev->mutex);
> if (!ev->block++)
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ev->dwork);
> mutex_unlock(&ev->mutex);
>
> with a cc: stable for backporting.
With these changes pushed to 2.6.40, I have the following sitting queued
up for 2.6.39, of which at least the performance regression and
blk-throttle fix really should go in. I'll let Tejun voice in on his
three changes. I would have pushed this a few days ago, but this thread
had it postponed a bit.
git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git for-linus
Jens Axboe (1):
scsi: remove performance regression due to async queue run
Shaohua Li (1):
block: don't delay blk_run_queue_async
Tejun Heo (3):
block: unexport DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE for legacy/fringe drivers
cdrom: always check_disk_change() on open
block: rescan partitions on invalidated devices on -ENOMEDIA too
Vivek Goyal (1):
blk-throttle: Use task_subsys_state() to determine a task's blkio_cgroup
block/blk-cgroup.c | 7 +++++++
block/blk-cgroup.h | 3 +++
block/blk-core.c | 4 +++-
block/blk-throttle.c | 9 ++++-----
block/cfq-iosched.c | 11 +++++------
drivers/block/DAC960.c | 1 -
drivers/block/amiflop.c | 1 -
drivers/block/ataflop.c | 1 -
drivers/block/floppy.c | 1 -
drivers/block/paride/pcd.c | 1 -
drivers/block/paride/pd.c | 1 -
drivers/block/paride/pf.c | 1 -
drivers/block/swim.c | 1 -
drivers/block/swim3.c | 1 -
drivers/block/ub.c | 1 -
drivers/block/xsysace.c | 1 -
drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c | 6 +++---
drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c | 1 -
drivers/cdrom/viocd.c | 1 -
drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c | 1 -
drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c | 1 -
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c | 2 ++
fs/block_dev.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
include/scsi/scsi_device.h | 1 +
25 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-18 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-17 10:27 [PATCH RESEND 1/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: don't use non-syncing event blocking in disk_check_events() Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 10:28 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: remove non-syncing __disk_block_events() and fold it into disk_block_events() Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 10:28 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events() properly wait for work cancellation Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 14:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-17 15:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 15:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-17 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-18 5:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 9:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-18 10:04 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 11:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 10:26 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-05-17 15:47 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-17 20:22 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DD39EE1.7080006@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mroos@linux.ee \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).