linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events() properly wait for work cancellation
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 12:26:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD39EE1.7080006@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=0_bv7s6=i2v-iP0vQmHHT3=tm8w@mail.gmail.com>

On 2011-05-18 11:46, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Just make the semaphore protect the count - and you're done.
>>
>> Yeah, with that gone, we don't even need the open-coding inside
>> disk_check_events().  It can simply call syncing block and unblock.
>> But, do you want that in -rc7?  Unnecessarily complicated as the
>> current code may be, converting the lock to mutex is a larger change
>> than adding an outer mutex and I think it would be better to do that
>> during the next cycle.
> 
> Quite frankly. right now I think I need to just release 2.6.39, and
> then for 2.6.40 merge the trivial
> 
>   mutex_lock(&ev->mutex);
>   if (!ev->block++)
>     cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ev->dwork);
>   mutex_unlock(&ev->mutex);
> 
> with a cc: stable for backporting.

With these changes pushed to 2.6.40, I have the following sitting queued
up for 2.6.39, of which at least the performance regression and
blk-throttle fix really should go in. I'll let Tejun voice in on his
three changes. I would have pushed this a few days ago, but this thread
had it postponed a bit.

  git://git.kernel.dk/linux-2.6-block.git for-linus

Jens Axboe (1):
      scsi: remove performance regression due to async queue run

Shaohua Li (1):
      block: don't delay blk_run_queue_async

Tejun Heo (3):
      block: unexport DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE for legacy/fringe drivers
      cdrom: always check_disk_change() on open
      block: rescan partitions on invalidated devices on -ENOMEDIA too

Vivek Goyal (1):
      blk-throttle: Use task_subsys_state() to determine a task's blkio_cgroup

 block/blk-cgroup.c              |    7 +++++++
 block/blk-cgroup.h              |    3 +++
 block/blk-core.c                |    4 +++-
 block/blk-throttle.c            |    9 ++++-----
 block/cfq-iosched.c             |   11 +++++------
 drivers/block/DAC960.c          |    1 -
 drivers/block/amiflop.c         |    1 -
 drivers/block/ataflop.c         |    1 -
 drivers/block/floppy.c          |    1 -
 drivers/block/paride/pcd.c      |    1 -
 drivers/block/paride/pd.c       |    1 -
 drivers/block/paride/pf.c       |    1 -
 drivers/block/swim.c            |    1 -
 drivers/block/swim3.c           |    1 -
 drivers/block/ub.c              |    1 -
 drivers/block/xsysace.c         |    1 -
 drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c           |    6 +++---
 drivers/cdrom/gdrom.c           |    1 -
 drivers/cdrom/viocd.c           |    1 -
 drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c |    1 -
 drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c  |    1 -
 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c         |   20 ++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c        |    2 ++
 fs/block_dev.c                  |   27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/scsi/scsi_device.h      |    1 +
 25 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-18 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-17 10:27 [PATCH RESEND 1/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: don't use non-syncing event blocking in disk_check_events() Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 10:28 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: remove non-syncing __disk_block_events() and fold it into disk_block_events() Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 10:28   ` [PATCH RESEND 2/3 v2.6.39-rc7] block: make disk_block_events() properly wait for work cancellation Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 14:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-17 15:11       ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 15:15         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-17 15:27           ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 22:40             ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-18  5:07               ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18  9:46                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-18 10:04                   ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 11:07                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-18 10:26                   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2011-05-17 15:47     ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-05-17 19:34       ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-17 20:22         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD39EE1.7080006@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    --cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).