linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 20:43:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD6B637.3060509@fusionio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110519103539.aa1b5094.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On 2011-05-19 02:35, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the s390 tree got a conflict in
> drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c between commit 9fd097b14918 ("block:
> unexport DISK_EVENT_MEDIA_CHANGE for legacy/fringe drivers") from Linus'
> tree and commit 263fa17de50e ("[S390] Remove tape block device driver")
> from the s390 tree.
> 
> The latter just removes the file updated by the former.  So I did that.

That works, thanks. The other fixup you are carrying should be gone now,
I had to pull in 2.6.39 final to resolve other conflicts.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-20 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-19  0:35 linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-20 18:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-22  0:27 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-20  2:02 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-03 23:49 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 12:45 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2020-05-29  0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-29  0:59 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD6B637.3060509@fusionio.com \
    --to=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).