From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] ath5k regression associating with APs in 2.6.38
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:31:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE525DB.1000908@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=8ZRUVWn3FLAMtPh=4yY1F0k6i9w@mail.gmail.com>
On 2011-05-17 7:14 PM, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
> 2011/5/17 Seth Forshee<seth.forshee@canonical.com>:
>> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:02:30AM +0200, Seth Forshee wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:30:42PM +0300, Nick Kossifidis wrote:
>>> > Hmm I don't see any errors from reset/phy code, can you disable
>>> > Network Manager/wpa-supplicant and test connection on an open network
>>> > using iw ? It 'll give us a better picture...
>>> >
>>> > If iw doesn't return any scan results we are probably hitting a PHY/RF
>>> > error specific to your device (not all vendors follow the reference
>>> > design). Maybe we should follow a blacklist/whitelist approach for
>>> > this feature.
>>>
>>> I got the results back from my tester. He was able to get scan results,
>>> but it took multiple tries and the direct probe failures appear in the
>>> log. He didn't enable ATH5K_DEBUG_RESET this time; let me know if you
>>> need that and I'll request he retest with the extra debug logs enabled.
>>
>> I got some more feedback. Most of the time iw does not get scan results,
>> but even when it does connecting to the AP isn't always successful. The
>> tester did note that he doesn't seem to have any trouble if his machine
>> is within a few feet of his AP. Let me know if you'd like something else
>> tested.
>>
>> I noticed that bugzilla #31922 (ath5k: Decreased throughput in IBSS or
>> 802.11n mode) is also fixed by reverting 8aec7af9. It seems like the
>> synth-only channel changes are resulting in poor connection quality.
>> Maybe that patch needs to be reverted?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Seth
>>
>>
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mickflemm/01-fast-chan-switch-modparm
Disabling fast channel change also fixed a reproducible crash on
Broadcom based MIPS boards with some cards (AR2413, I think).
- Felix
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-31 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-04 15:38 ath5k regression associating with APs in 2.6.38 Seth Forshee
2011-05-04 17:27 ` John W. Linville
2011-05-04 19:26 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-04 20:09 ` Nick Kossifidis
2011-05-05 13:52 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-05 14:30 ` Nick Kossifidis
2011-05-05 14:54 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-05 15:01 ` Justin P. Mattock
2011-05-05 15:15 ` Nick Kossifidis
2011-05-09 7:02 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-17 16:57 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-17 17:14 ` Nick Kossifidis
2011-05-17 18:50 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-19 21:28 ` Seth Forshee
2011-05-31 17:31 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE525DB.1000908@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
--cc=mickflemm@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox