From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: Joe Pranevich <jpranevich@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0 change listings - Wonderful World of Linux 3.0
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:01:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DE886DC.1040807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikvU-XUu9sWX-E87a7CUtA7j+ZRpA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/30/2011 09:59 PM, Joe Pranevich wrote:
> Happy Memorial Day! I'm a day later than I said that I would be, but I
> have attached a first draft of the "Wonderful World of Linux 3.0"
> document. Please take a look and I hope that you find this helpful,
> but I also hope that it can be a place that individuals not associated
> with kernel development can turn to find out what is new in the
> release. (With "new" being relative, of course. With no dev release,
> these features have been available already.)
>
> Good thing I didn't post it yesterday anyway, since I was still
> calling it Linux 2.8. :)
>
> Please take a look at this and let me know if I should make any
> corrections. I appreciate your help.
Hi, what about static analysis and found bugs? There appeared a lot of
tools which were first run on the 2.6 kernel and wiped out many kind of
bugs. This includes imbalanced locking, NULL/dangling pointer
dereferences, . I don't think that for example Coverity was ever run on
linux-2.4 or 2.5. I for sure know, that linux kernel verification
project, smatch, stanse and coccinelle didn't even exist before 2.6.
So 3.0 in fact should be safer, at least in many paths which are barely
tested otherwise -- fail and go-here-once-in-a-year paths.
regards,
--
js
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-03 7:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-30 19:59 Linux 3.0 change listings - Wonderful World of Linux 3.0 Joe Pranevich
2011-05-31 3:16 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-05-31 5:22 ` Joe Pranevich
2011-05-31 5:48 ` david
2011-05-31 20:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2011-06-01 17:47 ` Calvin Walton
2011-06-02 0:03 ` Joe Pranevich
2011-05-31 15:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-06-03 7:01 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DE886DC.1040807@gmail.com \
--to=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jpranevich@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox