Re: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access

[Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>]

Le 01/06/2011 16:54, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov :
> On 6/1/11, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 17:49 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>> Currently atmel_nand driver used by AT91 and AVR32 calls a special
>>> callback
>>> which return nand partition table and number of partitions. However in all
>>> boards this callback returns just static data. So drop this callback and
>>> make atmel_nand use partition table provided statically via platform_data.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thanks for this update, always nice seeing code being optimized. I
>> really can't recall why it was made like this in the first place...
>>
>> For the AVR32 related parts:
>>
>> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>
>>
>> <snipp diff>
>>
>> Will this go through the linux-mtd tree (since it spans two archs) or
>> should it go through an arch tree?
> 
> On one hand, I'd prefer for this to go through the linux-mtd, if noone objects,
> as I'd also like to submit several (a pile) patches cleaning up mtd
> partitioning, which would depend on this.
> 
> OTOH, I think there will be a cleanup of AT91 platform, which would bring
> lot's of conflicts with this patch, if it goes through linux-mtd.


I am in favor for a mainline inclusion through linux-mtd tree.

On the AT91 side, we will have to take this inclusion into account to
avoid merge conflicts... But as long as this cleanup is not ready yet, I
prefer to go forward this way.

For that purpose, that would be good to see this patch in linux-next.

Thanks to all of you, bye,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre