public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS problem in 2.6.32
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:49:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DEE2C70.8060301@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6D8DA3D2-D90B-4D82-BDC9-C3F0264A68BF@mit.edu>

>> So who keeps track on which patches needs to get backported or not? And who will backport XFS fixes back to 2.6.32?
>
> An interested kernel developer.   They can become interested because they personally have the time or interest, or because someone pays them to become interested.  Support of the stable kernel series is not something that happens magically, or which is funded by a charity, you know.  That's why some companies pay $$$ for a supported distribution kernel.
OK so my thought was totally wrong. I thought the longterm stable 
releases will still get bugfixed by SGI or whoever wrote the stuff. 
Sorry for that then. But what is then the idea of a longterm stable?

Stefan

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-07 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-07 12:46 XFS problem in 2.6.32 Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-06-07 13:36 ` Theodore Tso
2011-06-07 13:49   ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG [this message]
2011-06-07 19:45     ` david
2011-06-07 21:57       ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-06-07 22:05         ` david
2011-06-08  3:28         ` Theodore Tso
2011-06-08  7:05           ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
2011-06-08  8:00           ` John Kacur
2011-06-08 13:38             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-08 14:16               ` Mike Snitzer
2011-06-08 18:50                 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-08 21:01                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-08  9:03           ` Alan Cox
2011-06-08 13:30           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-09  2:57             ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-09  7:22               ` Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DEE2C70.8060301@profihost.ag \
    --to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@MIT.EDU \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox