From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.0.0-rc2-git1 -- BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:847
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:12:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DEFF3B9.7070907@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106081407440.10320@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 06/08/2011 02:34 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
>>> Not sure why this ever actually worked with apparmor if prepare_creds()
>>> does an unconditional GFP_KERNEL allocation since this codepath hasn't
>>> changed in at least a year and we're holding a spinlock from setrlimit.
>>> John?
>>
>> Probably a lack of people enabling (and using!) both apparmor and
>> might_sleep. I don't this would be caught by a randconfig boot test.
>>
>
> Right, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP isn't enabled by default even though
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL is. We should probably just allow prepare_creds() to
> take a gfp_t argument just like security_prepare_creds() and change
> existing callers to use GFP_KERNEL with the exception of those using
> setrlimit where we're always holding the spinlock.
>
> Documentation/security/credentials.txt says this:
>
> To alter the current process's credentials, a function should first prepare a
> new set of credentials by calling:
>
> struct cred *prepare_creds(void);
>
> this locks current->cred_replace_mutex and then allocates and constructs a
> duplicate of the current process's credentials, returning with the mutex still
> held if successful. It returns NULL if not successful (out of memory).
>
> although that mutex doesn't exist. David, any downsides to passing the
> gfp_t into prepare_creds()?
Well it certainly isn't needed for the apparmor case, as the bug is being
triggered by how apparmor handles policy replacement, and we have a means
of handling that for atomic contexts.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-08 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-08 19:02 3.0.0-rc2-git1 -- BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:847 Miles Lane
2011-06-08 20:09 ` David Rientjes
2011-06-08 20:17 ` Matt Mackall
2011-06-08 21:34 ` David Rientjes
2011-06-08 21:57 ` Kyle Moffett
2011-06-08 22:12 ` John Johansen [this message]
2011-06-08 22:07 ` John Johansen
2011-06-08 23:47 ` [stable] " Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DEFF3B9.7070907@canonical.com \
--to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox