From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755171Ab1FIHAG (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 03:00:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39823 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751380Ab1FIHAB (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2011 03:00:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4DF06F4F.8050308@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:59:27 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rusty Russell CC: Linux Virtualization , Linux Kernel Mailing List , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: virtio scsi host draft specification, v3 References: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> <87lixbgax9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: <87lixbgax9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/09/2011 01:28 AM, Rusty Russell wrote: >> > after some preliminary discussion on the QEMU mailing list, I present a >> > draft specification for a virtio-based SCSI host (controller, HBA, you >> > name it). > > OK, I'm impressed. This is very well written and it doesn't make any of > the obvious mistakes wrt. virtio. Thanks very much, and thanks to those who corrected my early mistakes. > I assume you have an implementation, as well? Unfortunately not; "we're working on it", which means I should start in July when I come back from vacation. Do you prefer to wait for one before I make a patch to the LyX source? In the meanwhile, can you reserve a subsystem ID for me? Paolo