From: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: CFQ: async queue blocks the whole system
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:00:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DF1EB45.1070706@tao.ma> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110610091427.GB4183@redhat.com>
On 06/10/2011 05:14 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:48:37PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
>
> [..]
>>>> btw, reverting the patch doesn't work. I can still get the livelock.
>
> What test exactly you are running. I am primarily interested in whether
> you still get the hung task timeout warning where a writer is waiting on
> get_request_wait() for more than 120 secods or not.
>
> Livelock might be a different problem and for which Christoph provided
> a patch for XFS.
>
>>>
>>> Can you give following patch a try and see if it helps. On my system this
>>> does allow CFQ to dispatch some writes once in a while.
>> Sorry, this patch doesn't work in my test.
>
> Can you give me backtrace of say 15 seconds each with and without patch.
> I think now we must be dispatching some writes, that's a different thing
> that writer still sleeps more than 120 seconds because there are way
> too many readers.
>
> May be we need to look into show workload tree scheduling takes place and
> tweak that logic a bit.
OK, our test cases can be downloaded for free. ;)
svn co http://code.taobao.org/svn/dirbench/trunk/meta_test/press/set_vs_get
Modify run.sh to be fit for your need. Normally within 10 mins, you will
get the livelock. We have a SAS disk with 15000 RPMs.
btw, you have to mount the volume on /test since the test program are
not that clever. :)
Regards,
Tao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-10 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-09 10:49 CFQ: async queue blocks the whole system Tao Ma
2011-06-09 14:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 14:34 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-09 14:47 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 15:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 15:44 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 18:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10 5:48 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10 9:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10 10:00 ` Tao Ma [this message]
2011-06-10 15:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-11 7:24 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-13 10:08 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-13 21:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-14 7:03 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-14 13:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-14 15:42 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-14 21:14 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-17 3:04 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-17 12:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-17 14:34 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10 1:19 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10 1:34 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10 2:06 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10 2:35 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10 3:02 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-10 9:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10 9:21 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-13 1:03 ` Shaohua Li
2011-06-10 9:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-10 9:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-10 9:31 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DF1EB45.1070706@tao.ma \
--to=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox