Re: [PATCH 14/15] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 06/13/2011 06:38 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 06/12/2011 04:38 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  On 06/10/2011 06:47 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >>  >   Also, shadow walking is not significantly faster than guest page table walking.  And if we miss, we have to walk the guest page tables in any case.
> >>  >
> >>
> >>  Um. i think walking guest page table is slower, it needs to walk memslots for many times
> >>  and it triggers page fault if the host page is swapped.
> >
> >  Well, if the page is swapped, we can't store anything in the spte.
> >
>
> If we walk guest page table, we need to access guest page, and guest page can
> be swapped out anytime, but shadow page table is the kernel page, it is not swapped,
> that is why i think walking shadow page table is faster than guest page table.

It's unlikely that the guest page table is swapped out since the 
hardware just walked it.

> >  And if we only store the mmio/ram condition in the spte (via the two types of page faults) we don't need to walk the spte.  We know immediately if we need to search the slots or not.
> >
> >>  And it is hardly missed, since for tdp, it infrequency zaps shadow pages, for soft mmu,
> >>  the mmio spte is always unsync, and in guest, the mmio region is always mapped by kernel,
> >>  so it is infrequency to be update and lazily flushed.
> >
> >  We still get frequent mmio misses.
> >
>
> I did the test, run three guests(4vcpu + 512M) on my box (4cores + 2G) and compile kernel
> in guests, for 1 hour, no mmio is missed(hard mmu and soft mmu), it means that usually we
> can catch almost all mmio by walking shadow page.

Yes, but if you rely on EPT misconfig then you don't need that walk at 
all (conversely, if we do walk unconditionally, we can use EPT 
violations instead).

> >>  If it is direct, we only need to compare the pga, and direct=0, we only need to
> >>  compare gva, i'll fix the code to make it clear.
> >
> >  But for nested npt, we get the ngpa, not a gva.
> >
>
> We treat nested npt as the 'direct' mmio:
> 	r = handle_mmio_page_fault(vcpu, addr, error_code, mmu_is_nested(vcpu));
>
> also do not cache gva for nested npt:
> 	if (handle_abnormal_pfn(vcpu, mmu_is_nested(vcpu) ? 0 : addr,
> 				walker.gfn, pfn, walker.pte_access,&r))

Okay.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function