linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Nao Nishijima <nao.nishijima.xt@hitachi.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jcm@redhat.com, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] genhd: add a new attribute in device structure
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:27:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFAF3D2.5030506@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikUNqTxgD_+TTVpcFyRDu_fSesrsg@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/16/2011 07:20 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:09, Kay Sievers<kay.sievers@vrfy.org>  wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 18:25, James Bottomley
>> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>  wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 09:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> All userspace naming will be taken care of by the usual udev rules, so
>>>>> for disks, something like /dev/disk/by-preferred/<fred>  which would be
>>>>> the usual symbolic link.
>>>>
>>>> No, udev can not create such a link after the preferred name is set, as
>>>> it has no way of knowing that the name was set.
>>>
>>> It can if we trigger a uevent.  Note: I'm not advocating this ... I'd be
>>> equally happy having whatever sets the kernel name create the link (or
>>> tickle udev to create it).  We definitely require device links, though,
>>> to get this to work.
>
> Guess all that would work now, including mount(8) not canonicalizing.
> What would happen if we mount:
>    /dev/disk/by-pretty/foo
> and some tool later thinks the pretty name should better be 'bar', it
> writes the name to /sys, we get a uevent, the old link disappears, we
> get a new link, mount has no device node anymore for the mounted
> device ...
>
> So we basically get a one-shot additional pretty name? Guess, the
> _single_ name changed anytime later just asks for serious problems. We
> need to set it very early to be really useful, but how, where is it
> coming from?
>
Well, certain storage arrays are able to print out the user-defined 
name for the LUNs:

# sg_vpd -p 0xc8 /dev/sdc
Extended device identification (RDAC) VPD Page:
   Volume Unique Identifier: 60080e50001bf1f0000005004ddb05a4
     Creation Number: 1280, Timestamp: Tue May 24 03:11:00 2011
   Volume User Label: mas-1
   Storage Array Unique Identifier: 60080e50001bf1f0000000004d418973
   Storage Array User Label: LSI-SAS-DIF
   Logical Unit Number: 0000000000000000

where the 'Volume User Label' is the name the administrator has 
given to the LUN on the storage array.

So for these kind of things it would be useful.

However, a single pretty name is quite a limitation.
And I also fail to see why this can't be handled in userspace.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-17  6:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-15  8:16 [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Persistent device name using preferred name Nao Nishijima
2011-06-15  8:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] genhd: add a new attribute in device structure Nao Nishijima
2011-06-15 14:43   ` James Bottomley
2011-06-15 15:33   ` Greg KH
2011-06-16 12:03     ` Nao Nishijima
2011-06-16 15:41       ` Greg KH
2011-06-16 15:50         ` James Bottomley
2011-06-16 16:14           ` Greg KH
2011-06-16 16:25             ` James Bottomley
2011-06-16 17:09               ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-16 17:20                 ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-16 18:00                   ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-06-16 18:05                     ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-16 18:15                       ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-06-16 18:31                         ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-16 21:25                     ` Stefan Richter
2011-06-17  6:27                   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2011-06-17 12:28                     ` Nao Nishijima
2011-06-17 11:36                   ` Nao Nishijima
2011-06-16 18:19               ` Greg KH
2011-06-16 20:31                 ` James Bottomley
2011-06-16 22:05                   ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-16 22:45                     ` James Bottomley
2011-06-16 23:04                       ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-17 11:53                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-17 14:30                           ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-17 14:27                         ` James Bottomley
2011-06-17 14:40                           ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-17 14:49                             ` James Bottomley
2011-06-17 15:39                               ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-17 16:12                                 ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-17 16:22                                   ` Greg KH
2011-06-18 19:40                                     ` James Bottomley
2011-06-18 19:55                                       ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-21  4:51                                         ` Nao Nishijima
2011-06-19  1:54                           ` Kyle Moffett
2011-06-19  4:14                             ` James Bottomley
2011-06-17  6:55                       ` Stefan Richter
2011-06-17  5:25                   ` Greg KH
2011-06-17 15:41                     ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-06-17 15:57                       ` Kay Sievers
2011-06-17  3:33             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-17  5:22               ` Greg KH
2011-06-17  8:15                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-06-16 17:32           ` Douglas Gilbert
2011-06-16 18:02             ` Al Viro
2011-06-16 22:48             ` James Bottomley
2011-06-15  8:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] sd: print preferred name in kernel messages Nao Nishijima
2011-06-15  8:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] fs: print preferred name in procfs messages Nao Nishijima
2011-06-15 15:37 ` [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] Persistent device name using preferred name Greg KH
2011-06-17  5:58   ` Nao Nishijima

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DFAF3D2.5030506@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nao.nishijima.xt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).