From: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atomic: cleanup asm-generic atomic*.h inclusion
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:42:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DFBA001.4010500@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim5zEo=Rn2sqUExL-8n=p4inLEpuQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/17/11 11:06 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> fixes one thing while breaking another. linux/atomic.h includes
> asm/atomic.h which includes asm-generic/atomic.h which includes
> asm-generic/atomic-long.h which needs atomic_add_unless(), but that
> isnt provided until after the asm/atomic.h include in linux/atomic.h.
>
> but linux/atomic.h needs asm/atomic.h before atomic_add_unless()
> because it relies on the new __atomic_add_unless().
>
Right. I think we need to get rid of that include as well:
--- a/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/atomic.h
@@ -156,7 +145,5 @@ static inline void atomic_clear_mask(unsigned long
mask, unsigned long *addr)
#define smp_mb__before_atomic_inc() barrier()
#define smp_mb__after_atomic_inc() barrier()
-#include <asm-generic/atomic-long.h>
-
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
#endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_ATOMIC_H */
since <linux/atomic.h> includes it directly now.
> having linux/atomic.h and asm-generic/atomic.h just strikes me as
> wrong. the point of asm-generic is to unify things, but now we have
> two places to unify things without 0 indication as to which is for
> which ? i'm wondering if we shouldnt convert all arches to
> asm-generic/atomic.h and then add your new logic there and just skip
> this whole linux/atomic.h mess.
I believe the logic is:
<asm-generic/atomic.h> shared code for simple archs that don't want to
define their own primitives. Only used by 4 archs.
<linux/atomic.h> a header file that's usable in machine independent
kernel code.
<linux/atomic.h> seems to be relatively recent, introduced by:
commit 3f9d35b9514da6757ca98831372518f9eeb71b33
Author: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Nov 11 14:05:08 2010 -0800
atomic: add atomic_inc_not_zero_hint()
<asm-generic/atomic.h> came from:
commit d3cb487149bd706aa6aeb02042332a450978dc1c
Author: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri Jan 6 00:11:20 2006 -0800
[PATCH] atomic_long_t & include/asm-generic/atomic.h V2
My guess is that if <linux/atomic.h> existed in 2006, people would've
added shared code over there. Also, the code in <asm-generic/atomic.h>
is not truly generic:
smp_mb__before_atomic_dec() for eg is implemented differently for some
archs.
-Arun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-06 17:27 [PATCH 1/3] atomic: use <linux/atomic.h> Arun Sharma
2011-06-06 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] atomic: move atomic_add_unless to generic code Arun Sharma
2011-06-06 20:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 17:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] atomic: generalize atomic_add_unless_return Arun Sharma
2011-06-06 20:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09 18:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 20:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] atomic: use <linux/atomic.h> Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 21:06 ` Arun Sharma
2011-06-15 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-16 0:57 ` Arun Sharma
2011-06-16 1:29 ` [PATCH] atomic: cleanup asm-generic atomic*.h inclusion Arun Sharma
2011-06-17 6:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-17 17:11 ` Arun Sharma
2011-06-17 17:28 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-17 17:49 ` Arun Sharma
2011-06-17 18:06 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-17 18:42 ` Arun Sharma [this message]
2011-06-17 19:07 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-06-17 20:05 ` Arun Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DFBA001.4010500@fb.com \
--to=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox