From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932085Ab1FUKAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:00:31 -0400 Received: from mailgw1.uni-kl.de ([131.246.120.220]:40020 "EHLO mailgw1.uni-kl.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753738Ab1FUKA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 06:00:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4E006BB9.90505@itwm.fraunhofer.de> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:00:25 +0200 From: Bernd Schubert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110510 Iceowl/1.0b2 Icedove/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Catalin Marinas CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 3.0-rc3 kmemleak reports References: <20110621095733.GA10396@1n450.cable.virginmedia.net> In-Reply-To: <20110621095733.GA10396@1n450.cable.virginmedia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ITWM-CharSet: ISO-8859-1 X-ITWM-Scanned-By: mail2.itwm.fhg.de Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/21/2011 11:57 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:40:15AM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: >> For some reasons I build a kernel with kmemleak support and got a >> few reports. > > Do you know if they appear in 2.6.39 as well? No idea, if it is important I can build a previous kernel version (but please, no bisecting, I'm too busy with other things). Cheers, Bernd