linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hch@infradead.org,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] ptrace: s/tracehook_tracer_task()/ptrace_parent()/
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:44:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E00841F.6000202@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110620201603.GA17157@redhat.com>

On 06/20/2011 01:16 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/17, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>> tracehook.h is on the way out.  Rename tracehook_tracer_task() to
>> ptrace_parent() and move it from tracehook.h to ptrace.h.
> 
> I am a bit surpised you decided to keep this helper. Can't we simply
> kill it?
> 
> OK, we will see. I guess this change is mostly needed to remove yet
> another function from tracehook.h.
> 
>> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *__check_mem_permission(struct task_struct *task)
>>  	if (task_is_stopped_or_traced(task)) {
>>  		int match;
>>  		rcu_read_lock();
>> -		match = (tracehook_tracer_task(task) == current);
>> +		match = (ptrace_parent(task) == current);
>>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>>  		if (match && ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH))
> 
> All we need
> 
> 	if (task_is_traced(task) && task->parent == current) {
> 		if (ptrace_may_access()
> 			return mm;
> 	}
> 
> Of course I do not blame this patch, my only point is that this helper
> only adds more confusion imho.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static int may_change_ptraced_domain(struct task_struct *task,
>>  	int error = 0;
>>
>>  	rcu_read_lock();
>> -	tracer = tracehook_tracer_task(task);
>> +	tracer = ptrace_parent(task);
>>  	if (tracer) {
>>  		/* released below */
>>  		cred = get_task_cred(tracer);
> 
> Hmm. And then this task_struct is used after we dropped rcu_read_lock().
> 
> John, is this correct?
> 
nope this use is wrong.  The following patch should fix this

===

AppArmor: Fix reference to rcu protected pointer outside of rcu_read_lock

The pointer returned from tracehook_tracer_task() is only valid inside
the rcu_read_lock.  However the tracer pointer obtained is being passed
to aa_may_ptrace outside of the rcu_read_lock critical section.

Mover the aa_may_ptrace test into the rcu_read_lock critical section, to
fix this.

Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
---
 security/apparmor/domain.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index c825c6e..78adc43 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ static int may_change_ptraced_domain(struct task_struct *task,
 		cred = get_task_cred(tracer);
 		tracerp = aa_cred_profile(cred);
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* not ptraced */
 	if (!tracer || unconfined(tracerp))
@@ -82,6 +81,7 @@ static int may_change_ptraced_domain(struct task_struct *task,
 	error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracerp, to_profile, PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH);
 
 out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	if (cred)
 		put_cred(cred);
 
-- 
1.7.4.1



  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-21 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-17 14:50 [PATCHSET] ptrace: kill most tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/7] ptrace: kill task_ptrace() Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/7] ptrace: introduce ptrace_event_enabled() and simplify ptrace_event() and tracehook_prepare_clone() Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/7] ptrace: move SIGTRAP on exec(2) logic to ptrace_event() Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 20:25   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21  7:21     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-21 20:40       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23  8:58         ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] ptrace: kill trivial tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] ptrace: kill clone/exec tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 20:33   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21  7:24     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 6/7] ptrace: kill detah tracehooks Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 19:39   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21 20:23     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23  9:24     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:07   ` [PATCH 0/8] kill task_detached() (Was: ptrace: kill detah tracehooks) Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:08     ` [PATCH 1/8] make do_notify_parent() return bool Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23  9:52       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:08     ` [PATCH 2/8] kill tracehook_notify_death() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 12:22       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 13:21         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:27           ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-23 13:28             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 17:06               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-25 14:15                 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-26 20:51                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-27  8:24                     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-27 14:21                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-27 14:36                         ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:08     ` [PATCH 3/8] __ptrace_detach: avoid task_detached(), check do_notify_parent() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:25       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:09     ` [PATCH 4/8] make do_notify_parent() __must_check, update the callers Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:38       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-22 21:09     ` [PATCH 5/8] reparent_leader: check EXIT_DEAD instead of task_detached() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:09     ` [PATCH 6/8] kill task_detached() Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:10     ` [PATCH 7/8] do not change dead_task->exit_signal Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-22 21:10     ` [PATCH 8/8] redefine thread_group_leader() as exit_signal >= 0 Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-23 13:56       ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-17 14:50 ` [PATCH 7/7] ptrace: s/tracehook_tracer_task()/ptrace_parent()/ Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 20:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-06-21 11:44     ` John Johansen [this message]
2011-06-23  9:14     ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-20 11:16 ` [PATCHSET] ptrace: kill most tracehooks Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E00841F.6000202@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).