From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 16/22] KVM: MMU: introduce the rules to modify shadow page table
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:34:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E01FD7B.1030505@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E01FBC9.3020009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Introduce some interfaces to modify spte as linux kernel does:
- mmu_spte_clear_track_bits, it set the spte from present to nonpresent, and
track the stat bits(accessed/dirty) of spte
- mmu_spte_clear_no_track, the same as mmu_spte_clear_track_bits except
tracking the stat bits
- mmu_spte_set, set spte from nonpresent to present
- mmu_spte_update, only update the stat bits
Now, it does not allowed to set spte from present to present, later, we can
drop the atomicly opration for X86_32 host, and it is the preparing work to
get spte on X86_32 host out of the mmu lock
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 4fe1cb3..5ceb64a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -299,12 +299,30 @@ static bool spte_is_bit_cleared(u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, u64 bit_mask)
return (old_spte & bit_mask) && !(new_spte & bit_mask);
}
-static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+/* Rules for using mmu_spte_set:
+ * Set the sptep from nonpresent to present.
+ * Note: the sptep being assigned *must* be either not present
+ * or in a state where the hardware will not attempt to update
+ * the spte.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
+{
+ WARN_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep));
+ __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
+}
+
+/* Rules for using mmu_spte_update:
+ * Update the state bits, it means the mapped pfn is not changged.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
{
u64 mask, old_spte = *sptep;
WARN_ON(!is_rmap_spte(new_spte));
+ if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
+ return mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte);
+
new_spte |= old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask;
mask = shadow_accessed_mask;
@@ -325,6 +343,42 @@ static void update_spte(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte_to_pfn(old_spte));
}
+/*
+ * Rules for using mmu_spte_clear_track_bits:
+ * It sets the sptep from present to nonpresent, and track the
+ * state bits, it is used to clear the last level sptep.
+ */
+static int mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ pfn_t pfn;
+ u64 old_spte = *sptep;
+
+ if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
+ __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+ else
+ old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+
+ if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
+ return 0;
+
+ pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
+ if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
+ kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
+ if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
+ kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
+ return 1;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Rules for using mmu_spte_clear_no_track:
+ * Directly clear spte without caring the state bits of sptep,
+ * it is used to set the upper level spte.
+ */
+static void mmu_spte_clear_no_track(u64 *sptep)
+{
+ __set_spte(sptep, 0ull);
+}
+
static int mmu_topup_memory_cache(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
struct kmem_cache *base_cache, int min)
{
@@ -746,30 +800,9 @@ static void rmap_remove(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *spte)
pte_list_remove(spte, rmapp);
}
-static int set_spte_track_bits(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte)
-{
- pfn_t pfn;
- u64 old_spte = *sptep;
-
- if (!spte_has_volatile_bits(old_spte))
- __set_spte(sptep, new_spte);
- else
- old_spte = __xchg_spte(sptep, new_spte);
-
- if (!is_rmap_spte(old_spte))
- return 0;
-
- pfn = spte_to_pfn(old_spte);
- if (!shadow_accessed_mask || old_spte & shadow_accessed_mask)
- kvm_set_pfn_accessed(pfn);
- if (!shadow_dirty_mask || (old_spte & shadow_dirty_mask))
- kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
- return 1;
-}
-
static void drop_spte(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep)
{
- if (set_spte_track_bits(sptep, 0ull))
+ if (mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep))
rmap_remove(kvm, sptep);
}
@@ -787,7 +820,7 @@ static int rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 gfn)
BUG_ON(!(*spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", spte, *spte);
if (is_writable_pte(*spte)) {
- update_spte(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ mmu_spte_update(spte, *spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
write_protected = 1;
}
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
@@ -856,7 +889,8 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
new_spte &= ~shadow_accessed_mask;
- set_spte_track_bits(spte, new_spte);
+ mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(spte);
+ mmu_spte_set(spte, new_spte);
spte = rmap_next(kvm, rmapp, spte);
}
}
@@ -1077,7 +1111,7 @@ static void drop_parent_pte(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
u64 *parent_pte)
{
mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(sp, parent_pte);
- __set_spte(parent_pte, 0ull);
+ mmu_spte_clear_no_track(parent_pte);
}
static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -1525,7 +1559,7 @@ static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
spte = __pa(sp->spt)
| PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_ACCESSED_MASK
| PT_WRITABLE_MASK | PT_USER_MASK;
- __set_spte(sptep, spte);
+ mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
}
static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
@@ -1992,7 +2026,7 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
mark_page_dirty(vcpu->kvm, gfn);
set_pte:
- update_spte(sptep, spte);
+ mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
/*
* If we overwrite a writable spte with a read-only one we
* should flush remote TLBs. Otherwise rmap_write_protect
@@ -2198,11 +2232,11 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
return -ENOMEM;
}
- __set_spte(iterator.sptep,
- __pa(sp->spt)
- | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK
- | shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask
- | shadow_accessed_mask);
+ mmu_spte_set(iterator.sptep,
+ __pa(sp->spt)
+ | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK
+ | shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask
+ | shadow_accessed_mask);
}
}
return emulate;
@@ -3449,7 +3483,8 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
/* avoid RMW */
if (is_writable_pte(pt[i]))
- update_spte(&pt[i], pt[i] & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
+ mmu_spte_update(&pt[i],
+ pt[i] & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK);
}
}
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm);
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 14:27 [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] KVM: MMU: fix walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 17:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 2:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-27 6:35 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] KVM: MMU: do not update slot bitmap if spte is nonpresent Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] KVM: x86: fix broken read emulation spans a page boundary Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:21 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 14:29 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] KVM: x86: introduce vcpu_gva_to_gpa to cleanup the code Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:24 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-06-22 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] KVM: x86: abstract the operation for read/write emulation Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 10:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] KVM: x86: cleanup the code of " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] KVM: MMU: cache mmio info on page fault path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 8:48 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] KVM: MMU: optimize to handle dirty bit Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] KVM: MMU: cleanup for FNAME(fetch) Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] KVM: MMU: rename 'pt_write' to 'emulate' Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] KVM: MMU: count used shadow pages on prepareing path Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] KVM: MMU: remove bypass_guest_pf Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] KVM: MMU: filter out the mmio pfn from the fault pfn Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] KVM: MMU: abstract some functions to handle " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:34 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-06-22 14:34 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] KVM: MMU: clean up spte updating and clearing Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: MMU: do not need atomicly to set/clear spte Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] KVM: MMU: lockless walking shadow page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 11:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 11:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 12:18 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 12:27 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 13:01 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 13:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:35 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] KVM: MMU: reorganize struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] KVM: MMU: mmio page fault support Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 21:59 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 3:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 6:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 14:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-23 17:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-23 20:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-06-24 2:04 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-26 8:42 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-27 11:00 ` [PATCH v3 " Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 9:22 ` [PATCH v2 " Avi Kivity
2011-06-29 12:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-22 14:36 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] KVM: MMU: trace mmio page fault Xiao Guangrong
2011-06-29 9:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E01FD7B.1030505@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox