From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tshibata@ab.jp.nec.com,
leoli@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: Generalize sleep inside spinlock detection
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:19:39 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E02BEDB.2020103@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DF23A57.4030104@oracle.com>
Hi
>> There are quite a few other debugging options, some of which will be
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ja_JP/SubmitChecklist b/Documentation/ja_JP/SubmitChecklist
>> index 2df4576..cb5507b 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/ja_JP/SubmitChecklist
>> +++ b/Documentation/ja_JP/SubmitChecklist
>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Linux カーネルパッチ投稿者向けチェックリスト
>>
>> 12: CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB,
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES, CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK,
>> - CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP これら全てを同時に有効にして動作確認を
>> + CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP これら全てを同時に有効にして動作確認を
>> 行ってください。
This Japanese part looks correct to me. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 4:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-10 13:30 [GIT PULL] sched: Make sleep inside atomic detection work on !PREEMPT Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Remove pointless in_atomic() definition check Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Isolate preempt counting in its own config option Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: Make sleeping inside spinlock detection working in !CONFIG_PREEMPT Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-10 13:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Generalize sleep inside spinlock detection Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-10 15:37 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-06-23 4:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-06-22 22:48 ` [GIT PULL v2] sched: Make sleep inside atomic detection work on !PREEMPT Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-01 12:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 12:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-01 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 15:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 16:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-01 16:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-01 17:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-02 16:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-03 19:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-01 16:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-08 17:48 [PATCH 0/4] " Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 17:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Generalize sleep inside spinlock detection Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-08 19:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E02BEDB.2020103@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=tshibata@ab.jp.nec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox